Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Wed, 30 Jan 2019 18:19:33 +0100
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
To:     Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc:     Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
        Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>,
        Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: avoid confusion over the new RESCTRL config prompt
Message-ID: <20190130171933.GC21221@zn.tnic>
References: <20190129225218.15441-1-hannes@cmpxchg.org>
 <20190129230845.GG28773@zn.tnic>
 <20190130164626.GA17841@cmpxchg.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <20190130164626.GA17841@cmpxchg.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 11:46:26AM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> This is still awefully close to the cgroup CPU resource
> controller. Since it's more hardware-specific, and the config symbol
> also has the x86 in it, how about "x86 CPU resource control support"?

Fine by me.

What about

s/X86_RESCTRL/X86_CPU_RESCTRL/g

?

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)