Received: by 2002:ad5:474a:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i10csp6239357imu; Wed, 30 Jan 2019 11:09:55 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN5HuIODMAhr0YoZhq/AQV16fKikrB5ED+3nx/pwb4YKquJb/U4dHDL2+z40oKmqs4A2SRX3 X-Received: by 2002:a62:7504:: with SMTP id q4mr31098139pfc.180.1548875395171; Wed, 30 Jan 2019 11:09:55 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1548875395; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=UHXv9asaq4oqFsCFPWdLHNAcIBsTj1RyAruFLs/PHzHX3E/ByBdr1/Nb1Mf2glHG6I nfgmNTG451fsoDv0A2mZIMe4xg4K9IPtPlYrWbLX8TRF1LTlVaR9FI4eovLFY098IPX6 rXXQ1HF/a2JC8afAO6DOK01FhQgOBhOfd+P1G/YYbb6QBYdqdUim2Jjlpcp9u7O50Crj qdS75/kjDprM545lGuVK97aHVYSgZH/cg3gYmG+VzjWZQvRGbWqA39rp/J8hRelgcF3U m74RWrqo3vOCP14+0gRTV05RM1gCTFme0jQtYV/LLyHQPQF3eB4R3jggGqXvqGGB6f76 se0Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=u2kvNL8hyI8LvEhJp8PwSq49BVsqDIa5rehdFSpt/WA=; b=b+YRX9rGiRVyhgJotDHzTcFb9jsHE4gyI62VFAZAd9pJYgAR6zP2ZjnAeBj2ZLu+CQ n+UVuDt0OXZGwuJYPImNG7+RzjquDApIzdgQv+q/FkxUffT2sXTmolQbJ3cbpgyyIImQ FcREXKMHZ19/XdrpGW0lLwcXhrsjPdTda4Vw582+clXWHffWbfRk53b5pF+rTavcURh5 4k4uG22Fs+1ScsJM9OjQMopjCkd1dBjOOv9oisjh3ppQ+F+yYjPODKxxG/K9nfat+CnL H7rOP14rGYYmAad+CA5Li2fxny2Xso3ZhF+e6N1AQNEheZa6rfR6FEzLlaT4c08LnE+g F/Fw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@chromium.org header.s=google header.b=LAMal645; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=chromium.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id y73si1900334pgd.478.2019.01.30.11.09.39; Wed, 30 Jan 2019 11:09:55 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@chromium.org header.s=google header.b=LAMal645; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=chromium.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2387495AbfA3TH4 (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 30 Jan 2019 14:07:56 -0500 Received: from mail-lj1-f195.google.com ([209.85.208.195]:35067 "EHLO mail-lj1-f195.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2387403AbfA3THz (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Jan 2019 14:07:55 -0500 Received: by mail-lj1-f195.google.com with SMTP id x85-v6so571991ljb.2 for ; Wed, 30 Jan 2019 11:07:53 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=u2kvNL8hyI8LvEhJp8PwSq49BVsqDIa5rehdFSpt/WA=; b=LAMal645UtppVgxvUM0liVNBkXQhEeuOZbWAMkeKgNRLnJo9l1bO+ClwBIOB7IOvD5 KdRp2Los/M2vb5x2Ks1C8WtQuxKnYKu8FOYwSO0y4YGta86aMqHFMjkQkZDJ/buQ9zZS rnSNQrlDmEkMtcQ5MgWcxQhIHtN6GN+LpdmuY= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=u2kvNL8hyI8LvEhJp8PwSq49BVsqDIa5rehdFSpt/WA=; b=unVHY6FKw3LyE4+gwlGc/Fn+IRAoSZQW1t0Rfz7dhN04e2SjWMeG+FaMysfKT8/sTM Q+rBK9ZHgUo69mRvIvQpmqiIA/gycRSd7iSnA0Z3XxTawlvuLdSGgsgIJlz9nLnAVUje h2qT9jdonmlY9gPt74nsiR67XfE35UNYW8aaduPt//VeETb+g+R5tvwfh5cpMG7QTcxC PK09RLkLt1NKYD2NfluaHEP+8FxsLNXxd9teyocb/KqPxC37WBAYV4H1Fq1oUkIlbMTk Eg0Hdzm6toa85vUKiPYHiWuNZn35r+tivGY7Ap5VnjeZYarOjN/15iiYYfOASYmu3dky T9iQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AHQUAuZNn7WWsH95DVc1tnFISWjaFRbBPLGtIzEwuTnvBYA9tEUiv4Gs LO08PvVkIPkge5frTalnswA96CeXgcA= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:a289:: with SMTP id k9-v6mr714488lja.24.1548875272330; Wed, 30 Jan 2019 11:07:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-lj1-f174.google.com (mail-lj1-f174.google.com. [209.85.208.174]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a20-v6sm417799ljf.28.2019.01.30.11.07.50 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 30 Jan 2019 11:07:51 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-lj1-f174.google.com with SMTP id u89-v6so577557lje.1 for ; Wed, 30 Jan 2019 11:07:50 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9715:: with SMTP id r21-v6mr26090126lji.30.1548875269976; Wed, 30 Jan 2019 11:07:49 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1546314952-15990-1-git-send-email-yong.wu@mediatek.com> <1546314952-15990-17-git-send-email-yong.wu@mediatek.com> In-Reply-To: <1546314952-15990-17-git-send-email-yong.wu@mediatek.com> From: Evan Green Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2019 11:07:13 -0800 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 16/20] memory: mtk-smi: Add bus_sel for mt8183 To: Yong Wu Cc: Joerg Roedel , Matthias Brugger , Robin Murphy , Rob Herring , Tomasz Figa , Will Deacon , linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, srv_heupstream@mediatek.com, "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" , LKML , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, Arnd Bergmann , yingjoe.chen@mediatek.com, youlin.pei@mediatek.com, Nicolas Boichat Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Dec 31, 2018 at 7:59 PM Yong Wu wrote: > > There are 2 mmu cells in a M4U HW. we could adjust some larbs entering > mmu0 or mmu1 to balance the bandwidth via the smi-common register > SMI_BUS_SEL(0x220)(Each larb occupy 2 bits). > > In mt8183, For better performance, we switch larb1/2/5/7 to enter > mmu1 while the others still keep enter mmu0. > > In mt8173 and mt2712, we don't get the performance issue, > Keep its default value(0x0), that means all the larbs enter mmu0. > > Note: smi gen1(mt2701/mt7623) don't have this bus_sel. > > CC: Matthias Brugger > Signed-off-by: Yong Wu > --- > drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++-- > 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c b/drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c > index 9790801..08cf40d 100644 > --- a/drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c > +++ b/drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c > @@ -49,6 +49,12 @@ > #define SMI_LARB_NONSEC_CON(id) (0x380 + ((id) * 4)) > #define F_MMU_EN BIT(0) > > +/* SMI COMMON */ > +#define SMI_BUS_SEL 0x220 > +#define SMI_BUS_LARB_SHIFT(larbid) ((larbid) << 1) > +/* All are MMU0 defaultly. Only specialize mmu1 here. */ > +#define F_MMU1_LARB(larbid) (0x1 << SMI_BUS_LARB_SHIFT(larbid)) > + > enum mtk_smi_gen { > MTK_SMI_GEN1, > MTK_SMI_GEN2 > @@ -57,6 +63,7 @@ enum mtk_smi_gen { > struct mtk_smi_common_plat { > enum mtk_smi_gen gen; > bool has_gals; > + u32 bus_sel; /* Balance some larbs to enter mmu0 or mmu1 */ > }; > > struct mtk_smi_larb_gen { > @@ -72,8 +79,8 @@ struct mtk_smi { > struct clk *clk_apb, *clk_smi; > struct clk *clk_gals0, *clk_gals1; > struct clk *clk_async; /*only needed by mt2701*/ > - void __iomem *smi_ao_base; > - > + void __iomem *smi_ao_base; /* only for gen1 */ > + void __iomem *base; /* only for gen2 */ > const struct mtk_smi_common_plat *plat; > }; > > @@ -410,6 +417,8 @@ static int __maybe_unused mtk_smi_larb_suspend(struct device *dev) > static const struct mtk_smi_common_plat mtk_smi_common_mt8183 = { > .gen = MTK_SMI_GEN2, > .has_gals = true, > + .bus_sel = F_MMU1_LARB(1) | F_MMU1_LARB(2) | F_MMU1_LARB(5) | > + F_MMU1_LARB(7), > }; > > static const struct of_device_id mtk_smi_common_of_ids[] = { > @@ -482,6 +491,11 @@ static int mtk_smi_common_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > ret = clk_prepare_enable(common->clk_async); > if (ret) > return ret; > + } else { > + res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0); > + common->base = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, res); > + if (IS_ERR(common->base)) > + return PTR_ERR(common->base); So you split base and smi_ao_base because they're completely different register regions, or because ->base is no longer "always on"? It's tempting to recombine them because they appear to be mutually exclusive, but if they're truly different register regions then I understand.