Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: WARNING in apparmor_secid_to_secctx
To:     Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Cc:     Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>,
        Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>,
        Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>,
        syzbot <syzbot+21016130b0580a9de3b5@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>,
        tyhicks@canonical.com, John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>,
        James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
        Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com>,
        syzkaller-bugs <syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com>,
        Jeffrey Vander Stoep <jeffv@google.com>,
        SELinux <selinux@tycho.nsa.gov>,
        Russell Coker <russell@coker.com.au>,
        Laurent Bigonville <bigon@debian.org>,
        syzkaller <syzkaller@googlegroups.com>
References: <000000000000c178e305749daba4@google.com>
 <CAHC9VhSeP=b1xxpCT8R-CYLEP3507ezwDwkq2Bsyekfa4otLGw@mail.gmail.com>
 <9537a6ff-daf4-d572-bf93-68230909b68e@tycho.nsa.gov>
 <4b37e892-4d79-aefb-92ab-7753b89b8963@tycho.nsa.gov>
 <CACT4Y+YOxTTYzEi3uCeLm3gquvSkJNZ+DhPVziEnbXGX6HVkVA@mail.gmail.com>
 <1ea19628-3bbe-2073-d623-824337c15ed6@tycho.nsa.gov>
 <CACT4Y+ai0do=8smTG0h0QXDnOrWh8PNwaTosJtqOEB_HG59eGg@mail.gmail.com>
 <b2b38348-f3a4-6498-c9b8-1090532f6a23@tycho.nsa.gov>
 <CACT4Y+bXaLe0FKyGPT=WqGitZPrawvpOXHS-UOVX0ZXTDV+JVQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <6c9112a2-33f3-0c29-c944-1d129a0026e7@tycho.nsa.gov>
 <CAHC9VhR6gG6_RkT1OEH4PArHpzUGkOjVCpKwAmad+TDfC15sgQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CACT4Y+YaBpi95Puae3Bjn1opL+UsdUWns2PDaFU-EmamuMusag@mail.gmail.com>
 <e2e02f43-abfe-171e-a5b7-3fb9086cc733@schaufler-ca.com>
 <CACT4Y+aaF8pLirqA+Yv4RjemDofEZymjPV6z5EEPQk3b7or10g@mail.gmail.com>
 <e598f3c7-22bc-91c2-2f47-0eec068f5180@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
 <CACT4Y+YXsD4f+ngzN7SGXcUGBn-jG1KeyrZJBzcUWo-AbdTe4w@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>
Message-ID: <05340d28-36c2-267e-d54e-416fddfba211@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>
Date:   Thu, 31 Jan 2019 09:22:49 +0900
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/60.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CACT4Y+YXsD4f+ngzN7SGXcUGBn-jG1KeyrZJBzcUWo-AbdTe4w@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 2019/01/30 23:45, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
>> Dmitry, is it possible to update configs for linux-next.git , for
>> we want to test a big change in LSM which will go to Linux 5.1 ?
>>
>> TOMOYO security module (CONFIG_SECURITY_TOMOYO=y) can now coexist with
>> SELinux/Smack/AppArmor security modules, and SafeSetID security module
>> (CONFIG_SECURITY_SAFESETID=y) was added. Testing with these modules also
>> enabled might find something...
> 
> Hi,
> 
> syzbot configs/cmdline args are stored here:
> https://github.com/google/syzkaller/tree/master/dashboard/config
> 
> I've tried to update to the latest kernel, the diff is below.
> Few questions:
> 1. How are modules enabled now?
> We pass security=selinux of security=smack on command line. What do we
> need to pass now to enable several modules at the same time?

Removing security= parameter from kernel boot command line will do it.

  security/apparmor/lsm.c:        .flags = LSM_FLAG_LEGACY_MAJOR | LSM_FLAG_EXCLUSIVE,
  security/selinux/hooks.c:       .flags = LSM_FLAG_LEGACY_MAJOR | LSM_FLAG_EXCLUSIVE,
  security/smack/smack_lsm.c:     .flags = LSM_FLAG_LEGACY_MAJOR | LSM_FLAG_EXCLUSIVE,
  security/tomoyo/tomoyo.c:       .flags = LSM_FLAG_LEGACY_MAJOR,
  security/security.c:                    if ((major->flags & LSM_FLAG_LEGACY_MAJOR) &&

But this means that, if same kernel config/cmdline are used between
linux-next.git and linux.git (etc.), syzbot will need to choose from

 (a) stop sharing kernel cmdline between linux-next.git and linux.git (etc.)

or

 (b) stop sharing kernel config between SELinux, Smack and AppArmor

or

 (c) start testing after the LSM changes went to linux.git as Linux 5.1-rc1

. Is (a) or (b) possible? If this is a too much change, (c) will be OK.