Received: by 2002:ad5:474a:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i10csp6790149imu; Wed, 30 Jan 2019 23:07:59 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN7G+gfJL0rOtR6ubFKSQQQt55DoGS38i3WQTyKmBYjAHxS+DVVUsdtgkNO30D/pLkspgMT/ X-Received: by 2002:a62:9f1b:: with SMTP id g27mr32711692pfe.87.1548918479329; Wed, 30 Jan 2019 23:07:59 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1548918479; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=UGe0DXako2CLkA1vfez+19KaC6t1Xey5hpI0IyTcjKs+g7md1nONEgYO5Tbjjnogpn yS2wOJVeQ1fHQGYaT/+xHMdJdgwnLZUfaFKOJ6exCI0v3boDSaSy1UyrSfDz7WgQzFw+ Sm73gR9JXVZVf7X5WpAcJ1u+v/dBkDP1k43NbCFiLw+R/9R5PbIgkwYdUPzLBgig+kFi iydtcm28BZWstomxMoxQkk4KX/VH2S7MfbHSYqRbyRUXDm2LO/uAcQUKJlE9GPziRiWL pDq3pepqKJ/ioum2qPF+wPpLvQxQyDNNArut1tn0V7hYctAfbyelD7C1aabeppdtBtcf hhMg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject:dkim-signature; bh=MXHl21tpazUCycYGJIF5K2H108fXMrwBKp0kMfVZOHU=; b=CoA9OMp+X2bAT601OgfE2jT/Jpix69KbcvBT0NrirmzDPFG1oJ6vlcVXOhkEZL+OTB AkzrDOip4dYo2nBtgU2x4zrQMhPwvGo2qf+8G0V+C+P9Q8T6IHqyQqLCNC90t7WUL4sI paqsYYy8wAbL1JOUP078W5aRNiMXPNBHla8adsXZtrXHdyG7Ucum3AWXVldwVjjRFJqh borljtx7I4zry5ZaYBN0FASebu3kMrTO1e2e0BV2orfOqUDbenl0h1H2lvamXSrQsbov /wXDrfqBl0qoXkxrl7gIBgMP9RtcIm6cKADvKwTYDrIGStVbkJ9V+aAkCKASP/+Ie9F1 KOtg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@c-s.fr header.s=mail header.b=rCd82aqn; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id y6si3747820pfi.228.2019.01.30.23.07.43; Wed, 30 Jan 2019 23:07:59 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@c-s.fr header.s=mail header.b=rCd82aqn; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729863AbfAaHHh (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 31 Jan 2019 02:07:37 -0500 Received: from pegase1.c-s.fr ([93.17.236.30]:24488 "EHLO pegase1.c-s.fr" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726172AbfAaHHf (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Jan 2019 02:07:35 -0500 Received: from localhost (mailhub1-int [192.168.12.234]) by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43qrsH3KnTz9v0Ql; Thu, 31 Jan 2019 08:07:31 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: localhost; dkim=pass reason="1024-bit key; insecure key" header.d=c-s.fr header.i=@c-s.fr header.b=rCd82aqn; dkim-adsp=pass; dkim-atps=neutral X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at c-s.fr Received: from pegase1.c-s.fr ([192.168.12.234]) by localhost (pegase1.c-s.fr [192.168.12.234]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DAzsBnhWoB9O; Thu, 31 Jan 2019 08:07:31 +0100 (CET) Received: from messagerie.si.c-s.fr (messagerie.si.c-s.fr [192.168.25.192]) by pegase1.c-s.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43qrsH1tsMz9v0Qj; Thu, 31 Jan 2019 08:07:31 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=c-s.fr; s=mail; t=1548918451; bh=MXHl21tpazUCycYGJIF5K2H108fXMrwBKp0kMfVZOHU=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=rCd82aqnCmgVKey8lh2qo7e2czYPgKR5K0SsqXWaaG+aPdVhNoJAHK8cvl05jNaLQ 01Tbj78zc0z794OUHngjeqyEvlUQI7ONSfsFOcwtpy8Q//8zmi0Zwd5Q5S7O8IAO0Y J0iKKRNhFMGd08UKWW9aHyiQ2pzFvIMvvFhWRBCY= Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by messagerie.si.c-s.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 176168B78D; Thu, 31 Jan 2019 08:07:32 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at c-s.fr Received: from messagerie.si.c-s.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (messagerie.si.c-s.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10023) with ESMTP id 9D0PmJeNjYuQ; Thu, 31 Jan 2019 08:07:31 +0100 (CET) Received: from PO15451 (unknown [192.168.4.90]) by messagerie.si.c-s.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 075218B74C; Thu, 31 Jan 2019 08:07:29 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 19/21] treewide: add checks for the return value of memblock_alloc*() To: Mike Rapoport Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Rich Felker , linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Catalin Marinas , Heiko Carstens , x86@kernel.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, Max Filippov , Guo Ren , sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig , linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-c6x-dev@linux-c6x.org, Yoshinori Sato , Richard Weinberger , linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, Russell King , kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, Geert Uytterhoeven , Mark Salter , Dennis Zhou , Matt Turner , linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org, uclinux-h8-devel@lists.sourceforge.jp, Petr Mladek , linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org, linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, linux-um@lists.infradead.org, linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, Rob Herring , Greentime Hu , xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, Stafford Horne , Guan Xuetao , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Michal Simek , Tony Luck , Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Paul Burton , Vineet Gupta , Andrew Morton , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, "David S. Miller" , openrisc@lists.librecores.org, Stephen Rothwell References: <1548057848-15136-1-git-send-email-rppt@linux.ibm.com> <1548057848-15136-20-git-send-email-rppt@linux.ibm.com> <20190131064139.GB28876@rapoport-lnx> <8838f7ab-998b-6d78-02a8-a53f8a3619d9@c-s.fr> From: Christophe Leroy Message-ID: Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2019 08:07:29 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <8838f7ab-998b-6d78-02a8-a53f8a3619d9@c-s.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: fr Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Le 31/01/2019 à 07:44, Christophe Leroy a écrit : > > > Le 31/01/2019 à 07:41, Mike Rapoport a écrit : >> On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 07:07:46AM +0100, Christophe Leroy wrote: >>> >>> >>> Le 21/01/2019 à 09:04, Mike Rapoport a écrit : >>>> Add check for the return value of memblock_alloc*() functions and call >>>> panic() in case of error. >>>> The panic message repeats the one used by panicing memblock >>>> allocators with >>>> adjustment of parameters to include only relevant ones. >>>> >>>> The replacement was mostly automated with semantic patches like the one >>>> below with manual massaging of format strings. >>>> >>>> @@ >>>> expression ptr, size, align; >>>> @@ >>>> ptr = memblock_alloc(size, align); >>>> + if (!ptr) >>>> +     panic("%s: Failed to allocate %lu bytes align=0x%lx\n", __func__, >>>> size, align); >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport >>>> Reviewed-by: Guo Ren              # c-sky >>>> Acked-by: Paul Burton          # MIPS >>>> Acked-by: Heiko Carstens # s390 >>>> Reviewed-by: Juergen Gross          # Xen >>>> --- >>> >>> [...] >>> >>>> diff --git a/mm/sparse.c b/mm/sparse.c >>>> index 7ea5dc6..ad94242 100644 >>>> --- a/mm/sparse.c >>>> +++ b/mm/sparse.c >>> >>> [...] >>> >>>> @@ -425,6 +436,10 @@ static void __init sparse_buffer_init(unsigned >>>> long size, int nid) >>>>           memblock_alloc_try_nid_raw(size, PAGE_SIZE, >>>>                           __pa(MAX_DMA_ADDRESS), >>>>                           MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ACCESSIBLE, nid); >>>> +    if (!sparsemap_buf) >>>> +        panic("%s: Failed to allocate %lu bytes align=0x%lx nid=%d >>>> from=%lx\n", >>>> +              __func__, size, PAGE_SIZE, nid, __pa(MAX_DMA_ADDRESS)); >>>> + >>> >>> memblock_alloc_try_nid_raw() does not panic (help explicitly says: >>> Does not >>> zero allocated memory, does not panic if request cannot be satisfied.). >> >> "Does not panic" does not mean it always succeeds. > > I agree, but at least here you are changing the behaviour by making it > panic explicitly. Are we sure there are not cases where the system could > just continue functionning ? Maybe a WARN_ON() would be enough there ? Looking more in details, it looks like everything is done to live with sparsemap_buf NULL, all functions using it check it so having it NULL shouldn't imply a panic I believe, see code below. static void *sparsemap_buf __meminitdata; static void *sparsemap_buf_end __meminitdata; static void __init sparse_buffer_init(unsigned long size, int nid) { WARN_ON(sparsemap_buf); /* forgot to call sparse_buffer_fini()? */ sparsemap_buf = memblock_alloc_try_nid_raw(size, PAGE_SIZE, __pa(MAX_DMA_ADDRESS), MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ACCESSIBLE, nid); sparsemap_buf_end = sparsemap_buf + size; } static void __init sparse_buffer_fini(void) { unsigned long size = sparsemap_buf_end - sparsemap_buf; if (sparsemap_buf && size > 0) memblock_free_early(__pa(sparsemap_buf), size); sparsemap_buf = NULL; } void * __meminit sparse_buffer_alloc(unsigned long size) { void *ptr = NULL; if (sparsemap_buf) { ptr = PTR_ALIGN(sparsemap_buf, size); if (ptr + size > sparsemap_buf_end) ptr = NULL; else sparsemap_buf = ptr + size; } return ptr; } Christophe