Received: by 2002:ad5:474a:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i10csp7227103imu; Thu, 31 Jan 2019 07:02:39 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN689kkb203m+i3Y7dW2a5mEzP2qDcetHoympwJG6p8Oz5/aebztlBZvF31Y2YkJQBDOkBLy X-Received: by 2002:a63:c0f:: with SMTP id b15mr32089640pgl.314.1548946959553; Thu, 31 Jan 2019 07:02:39 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1548946959; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=dwX7KBgSIffhcP2iYdv47JENFATDJhqqhQx0WehkmU/0TBL8rXkLwvnSoAMnDi6ZNF r3g5zueoO0MYMOl/WekMA1LbATyNFKjelP+a1b5L4aLLH5VFPbAJ0+H0ECsGuKmjPdnz gklNcRCXtc9bOQ/EnsmVGlv33/fUcQPzYkZedfCa4Jsq+B9AYD/X4TaOcA+jjvYHSiSw uGouMDuqlbbqG0vkU/IeTZXBsEX9llOi9pR8OnqeIDAM+dsMAKD5MUHwweptAp16+SoG j9aLRJFt3cJpUh/LbGZx2cwl0uJuQIrBdw41GxHoJeL2INfNdJ48XQv2OhERJqRWHkHT JZ+A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:references:in-reply-to:message-id:date :subject:cc:to:from; bh=rx4Hr1FfHlGFhAaPE85LM+JSUr2sFt+TCWsCCPy90zg=; b=LqrTtrL0qgauDHCusIcUjmWWadAqvAFLBeDjbib6y1zkuicVpaOmhYgYQQTZ0Kb+++ L8YiAr7xbHIILNZMcZU7UAHK4eDpiksv49JuUApSiz2TJpqAWu4o5X4aN7wiZCgk+WJ8 /TuMY+plVkcChz9O15rnJW5pFmpKd1kykqQIa6AgBHYncHRVEDYcFos5b0u1/9m2a2DN McE4SzQpojcEBdzu+yJ7M6vg2PKntXtLfuIglmOGdK0GCx/MPsh+10lWILPJHs5vSAt5 4XmHH5Hp8qC/xiNtK7/9I+W4Xn2Kc7JKVg705jqo9GfQtK9PZUgg/BlpEk24oeXQeEZC aIAQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id j193si4207597pge.332.2019.01.31.07.02.20; Thu, 31 Jan 2019 07:02:39 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1732894AbfAaO7q (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 31 Jan 2019 09:59:46 -0500 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:45602 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1732840AbfAaO7p (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Jan 2019 09:59:45 -0500 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.72.51.249]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAFC6EBD; Thu, 31 Jan 2019 06:59:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from e112298-lin.cambridge.arm.com (usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com [10.72.51.249]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id A77ED3F59C; Thu, 31 Jan 2019 06:59:42 -0800 (PST) From: Julien Thierry To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, daniel.thompson@linaro.org, joel@joelfernandes.org, marc.zyngier@arm.com, christoffer.dall@arm.com, james.morse@arm.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will.deacon@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, Julien Thierry , Ard Biesheuvel , Oleg Nesterov Subject: [PATCH v10 12/25] arm64: irqflags: Use ICC_PMR_EL1 for interrupt masking Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2019 14:58:50 +0000 Message-Id: <1548946743-38979-13-git-send-email-julien.thierry@arm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.9.1 In-Reply-To: <1548946743-38979-1-git-send-email-julien.thierry@arm.com> References: <1548946743-38979-1-git-send-email-julien.thierry@arm.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Instead disabling interrupts by setting the PSR.I bit, use a priority higher than the one used for interrupts to mask them via PMR. When using PMR to disable interrupts, the value of PMR will be used instead of PSR.[DAIF] for the irqflags. Signed-off-by: Julien Thierry Suggested-by: Daniel Thompson Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas Cc: Catalin Marinas Cc: Will Deacon Cc: Ard Biesheuvel Cc: Oleg Nesterov --- arch/arm64/include/asm/efi.h | 11 +++++ arch/arm64/include/asm/irqflags.h | 100 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------- 2 files changed, 83 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/efi.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/efi.h index 7ed3208..c9e9a69 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/efi.h +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/efi.h @@ -44,6 +44,17 @@ #define ARCH_EFI_IRQ_FLAGS_MASK (PSR_D_BIT | PSR_A_BIT | PSR_I_BIT | PSR_F_BIT) +/* + * Even when Linux uses IRQ priorities for IRQ disabling, EFI does not. + * And EFI shouldn't really play around with priority masking as it is not aware + * which priorities the OS has assigned to its interrupts. + */ +#define arch_efi_save_flags(state_flags) \ + ((void)((state_flags) = read_sysreg(daif))) + +#define arch_efi_restore_flags(state_flags) write_sysreg(state_flags, daif) + + /* arch specific definitions used by the stub code */ /* diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/irqflags.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/irqflags.h index 24692ed..d4597b2 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/irqflags.h +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/irqflags.h @@ -18,7 +18,9 @@ #ifdef __KERNEL__ +#include #include +#include /* * Aarch64 has flags for masking: Debug, Asynchronous (serror), Interrupts and @@ -36,33 +38,27 @@ /* * CPU interrupt mask handling. */ -static inline unsigned long arch_local_irq_save(void) -{ - unsigned long flags; - asm volatile( - "mrs %0, daif // arch_local_irq_save\n" - "msr daifset, #2" - : "=r" (flags) - : - : "memory"); - return flags; -} - static inline void arch_local_irq_enable(void) { - asm volatile( - "msr daifclr, #2 // arch_local_irq_enable" - : + asm volatile(ALTERNATIVE( + "msr daifclr, #2 // arch_local_irq_enable\n" + "nop", + "msr_s " __stringify(SYS_ICC_PMR_EL1) ",%0\n" + "dsb sy", + ARM64_HAS_IRQ_PRIO_MASKING) : + : "r" (GIC_PRIO_IRQON) : "memory"); } static inline void arch_local_irq_disable(void) { - asm volatile( - "msr daifset, #2 // arch_local_irq_disable" - : + asm volatile(ALTERNATIVE( + "msr daifset, #2 // arch_local_irq_disable", + "msr_s " __stringify(SYS_ICC_PMR_EL1) ", %0", + ARM64_HAS_IRQ_PRIO_MASKING) : + : "r" (GIC_PRIO_IRQOFF) : "memory"); } @@ -71,12 +67,44 @@ static inline void arch_local_irq_disable(void) */ static inline unsigned long arch_local_save_flags(void) { + unsigned long daif_bits; unsigned long flags; - asm volatile( - "mrs %0, daif // arch_local_save_flags" - : "=r" (flags) - : + + daif_bits = read_sysreg(daif); + + /* + * The asm is logically equivalent to: + * + * if (system_uses_irq_prio_masking()) + * flags = (daif_bits & PSR_I_BIT) ? + * GIC_PRIO_IRQOFF : + * read_sysreg_s(SYS_ICC_PMR_EL1); + * else + * flags = daif_bits; + */ + asm volatile(ALTERNATIVE( + "mov %0, %1\n" + "nop\n" + "nop", + "mrs_s %0, " __stringify(SYS_ICC_PMR_EL1) "\n" + "ands %1, %1, " __stringify(PSR_I_BIT) "\n" + "csel %0, %0, %2, eq", + ARM64_HAS_IRQ_PRIO_MASKING) + : "=&r" (flags), "+r" (daif_bits) + : "r" (GIC_PRIO_IRQOFF) : "memory"); + + return flags; +} + +static inline unsigned long arch_local_irq_save(void) +{ + unsigned long flags; + + flags = arch_local_save_flags(); + + arch_local_irq_disable(); + return flags; } @@ -85,16 +113,32 @@ static inline unsigned long arch_local_save_flags(void) */ static inline void arch_local_irq_restore(unsigned long flags) { - asm volatile( - "msr daif, %0 // arch_local_irq_restore" - : - : "r" (flags) - : "memory"); + asm volatile(ALTERNATIVE( + "msr daif, %0\n" + "nop", + "msr_s " __stringify(SYS_ICC_PMR_EL1) ", %0\n" + "dsb sy", + ARM64_HAS_IRQ_PRIO_MASKING) + : "+r" (flags) + : + : "memory"); } static inline int arch_irqs_disabled_flags(unsigned long flags) { - return flags & PSR_I_BIT; + int res; + + asm volatile(ALTERNATIVE( + "and %w0, %w1, #" __stringify(PSR_I_BIT) "\n" + "nop", + "cmp %w1, #" __stringify(GIC_PRIO_IRQOFF) "\n" + "cset %w0, ls", + ARM64_HAS_IRQ_PRIO_MASKING) + : "=&r" (res) + : "r" ((int) flags) + : "memory"); + + return res; } #endif #endif -- 1.9.1