Received: by 2002:ac0:8c9a:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id r26csp57909ima; Thu, 31 Jan 2019 12:21:31 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN4xJ30OUMsyXRL/Z68+ZrLkKT3PC/PPwF+N9q1jHc8aAg817bf46REgm23tGQ1qXcmzK+Tn X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:2aa8:: with SMTP id j37mr34662532plb.226.1548966091898; Thu, 31 Jan 2019 12:21:31 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1548966091; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=tebHUANcP7UhDoYdxgRfBH/QOdFubrp9QnPhzWNyGqbMjZmfRkr8HlAcie1H6uhG7+ X6QaqPVtWkhYuIhwXVnm9UE9w+4MS5mEhh5JfbUgUFU64wLtDN6mTFGlLkF0KKYniQgY bIi8+WoGoPBn9qz1Re2ojP9Op58+9j3Dm4JGD1GBY+AxKRUZbzJHRONbURCt9NOhD/7/ 3Y/dS3SwWM8J62Giq3+w4nwuKln2ft9j9j0AdkdUNH1fQutplXfXgG3HPnr0qJ4XUijD V+A8F5r1Mspii+FSH3AdXj4odKX4538vwshD4uyNpVSa+oDXtdzxwRkUezohfwybSaQL myFQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:message-id:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version:references:in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject; bh=qgTi+8ZodOTg6T0y1V2f2/rCvT3neSV/umEdxpmruSo=; b=zaP2uutonJkBGwythJINpDeMIk0cG6f8W9xA4n/BYMSJCRh8ewMb1fxP9Ot22eWhC7 BQyN53yOk+uUorTFzCCrVAa54gdLlWsuozzVJ7AA3PmLYO8qmIBSw84BFmxKf6JWvokX X5bXNQFLQ1XoZxRe4S3w8TVK8PA/EOBlOPBmoxuS8Q90gRE58jGQCL+/wYGhyvZwuJ1n S/Ku8AcAhXS2hyyZiq2OkC1E2RrjZjbwq+fTTiMdk2GdueMezYQ8TZmA9/yZ4PVccoCZ LXTG/ynoZeFDzOIKYDcZwwTkZD8guu+f5jgUWjYcsCcN3KHQxftEoWdjo4XHJsFz4ABs 1D6w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 64si5564709pfe.74.2019.01.31.12.21.16; Thu, 31 Jan 2019 12:21:31 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727786AbfAaUVE (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 31 Jan 2019 15:21:04 -0500 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:40540 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725802AbfAaUVE (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Jan 2019 15:21:04 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098421.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x0VKKwa5049034 for ; Thu, 31 Jan 2019 15:21:02 -0500 Received: from e06smtp07.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp07.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.103]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2qc4sk1bha-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 31 Jan 2019 15:21:01 -0500 Received: from localhost by e06smtp07.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Thu, 31 Jan 2019 20:20:56 -0000 Received: from b06cxnps4074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.196) by e06smtp07.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.137) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Thu, 31 Jan 2019 20:20:52 -0000 Received: from d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.59]) by b06cxnps4074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id x0VKKpKK131494 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 31 Jan 2019 20:20:51 GMT Received: from d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29D91A404D; Thu, 31 Jan 2019 20:20:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id D371FA4057; Thu, 31 Jan 2019 20:20:49 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [9.80.107.203]) by d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Thu, 31 Jan 2019 20:20:49 +0000 (GMT) Subject: Re: [PATCH] security: mark expected switch fall-throughs From: Mimi Zohar To: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" , Casey Schaufler , John Johansen , James Morris , "Serge E. Hallyn" , Dmitry Kasatkin Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2019 15:20:39 -0500 In-Reply-To: References: <20190125025639.GA13946@embeddedor> <7b0a0b5b-38ce-a737-6420-2c96cce12527@embeddedor.com> <1548964731.6107.28.camel@linux.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.20.5 (3.20.5-1.fc24) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 19013120-0028-0000-0000-0000034182C6 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 19013120-0029-0000-0000-000023FF86C9 Message-Id: <1548966039.6107.29.camel@linux.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2019-01-31_10:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1901310150 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2019-01-31 at 14:12 -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote: > Mimi, > > On 1/31/19 1:58 PM, Mimi Zohar wrote: > > [Cc'ing James Morris] > > > > On Thu, 2019-01-24 at 21:47 -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote: > > > >>>>> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva > >>>> > >>>> Acked-by: Casey Schaufler > >>>> > >> > >> BTW, thanks, Casey. I'll take this in my tree. > > > > This patch touches multiple LSMs and IMA.  As James has already picked > > up similar patches, which are in his next-general branch, perhaps he > > could also pick up an updated version of this one. > > > > Yeah. I can either integrate your recent fix and respin if you don't mind, > or remove the fall-through comment and wait for James to take both patches, > yours and mine. > > What do you prefer? Either way is fine. Mimi