Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261491AbUCGGe4 (ORCPT ); Sun, 7 Mar 2004 01:34:56 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261766AbUCGGe4 (ORCPT ); Sun, 7 Mar 2004 01:34:56 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:44431 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261491AbUCGGe4 (ORCPT ); Sun, 7 Mar 2004 01:34:56 -0500 Date: Sat, 6 Mar 2004 22:34:50 -0800 From: "David S. Miller" To: Fredrik Tolf Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: IP_TOS setsockopt filters away MinCost Message-Id: <20040306223450.1b569ad3.davem@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <16458.44160.469394.230025@pc7.dolda2000.com> References: <16458.44160.469394.230025@pc7.dolda2000.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.7 (GTK+ 1.2.10; sparc-unknown-linux-gnu) X-Face: "_;p5u5aPsO,_Vsx"^v-pEq09'CU4&Dc1$fQExov$62l60cgCc%FnIwD=.UF^a>?5'9Kn[;433QFVV9M..2eN.@4ZWPGbdi<=?[:T>y?SD(R*-3It"Vj:)"dP Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 665 Lines: 15 On Sun, 7 Mar 2004 06:00:48 +0100 Fredrik Tolf wrote: > This didn't make sense to me. Is there some reason behind this, and > would someone like to explain it to me in that case? I just spent an > hour trying to debug my program to find it why it didn't want to set > minimal cost, while the other three TOS options worked. Please read the diffserv RFCs for the current meanins of the TOS bits. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/