Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Fri, 1 Feb 2019 11:58:38 +1100
From:   "Tobin C. Harding" <me@tobin.cc>
To:     "Tobin C. Harding" <tobin@kernel.org>
Cc:     Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
        Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
        David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
        Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@kvack.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/slab: Increase width of first /proc/slabinfo column
Message-ID: <20190201005838.GA8082@eros.localdomain>
References: <20190201004242.7659-1-tobin@kernel.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20190201004242.7659-1-tobin@kernel.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.2 (2019-01-07)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Feb 01, 2019 at 11:42:42AM +1100, Tobin C. Harding wrote:
[snip]

This applies on top of Linus' tree

	commit e74c98ca2d6a ('gfs2: Revert "Fix loop in gfs2_rbm_find"')

For this patch I doubt very much that it matters but for the record I
can't find mention in MAINTAINERS which tree to base work on for slab
patches.  Are mm patches usually based of an mm tree or do you guys work
off linux-next?

thanks,
Tobin.