Received: by 2002:ac0:8c9a:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id r26csp273835ima; Fri, 1 Feb 2019 03:10:13 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN6tHybC9JCqkv5Aatv5H/CIZOnlrbE+bJM9XaK7drNWJgIL+A6kX0z1GH0FSDGiivSZeTX5 X-Received: by 2002:a62:6503:: with SMTP id z3mr37769434pfb.169.1549019413669; Fri, 01 Feb 2019 03:10:13 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1549019413; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=OKyBhPUtZJOD4YbhUj991JCEYbBBu2bOsfSKa6pqtYhsUMduVlLDS7l40yYNLh0UZt RqBHX8h8DhfEX01YiFRI9/IffQAZlA4l35YpXVIX98UDuNMJXpZET8AnHS9ErvQ0cPTZ V4FhyrGIZmQBI92ZO598J/RWH9kmNh6ibPv53JwR8hdgbg4BKW4rB/em1RJspkUE6BUn rKYQ/6zoOWBNyyWDJxeGJrNy23ukoTtJ1YptAJLSlwinFLcLWmMU8MIjyzj4CRqDW6h7 n6EshXZTTfKe3xjPbBbMThCmgs0/Kz4i7WVZQDDkRZ/XVDOx+h53HqhTEOljDe47McfR 5dIA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:message-id :mime-version:references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=J5/2wASFBfQ0+e227IZWJLBoFOOVJ/mEojEEvH14k7w=; b=ThORigDrSiGe+XcctWtPFPEGjvqe5kmMQJ1DJIUJh9uqNa+7gobI80+tC7i6wnQPyJ zQBZTXDRbZJLwv0UcnaiAy4ECNOQ/7FTtY16Me61DHCBQ7y8JzEDuu/C70riGVGNzWsw PMpOT21sL9jiRKIdWzYBoVa5BK/n71HlmPobtUv+CWBJILyaqJPtAWkolYQRGbYhRakT eJsyQUWR9auGten5mH2wJGHyHL3uln+f26fqyUaKJ057el5bY/9Wmc3LGc7+7AsVnWoj Qnduh+2+yGMRSGjJ4FuGKLO3zsywIyDEy4inaCDK7CFk2NX0i2c5i3fM1pmtuEcB+WbS FJrA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id s84si6850998pgs.306.2019.02.01.03.09.57; Fri, 01 Feb 2019 03:10:13 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730053AbfBALIa (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 1 Feb 2019 06:08:30 -0500 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:44984 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729721AbfBALIa (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Feb 2019 06:08:30 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098416.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x11B47mO063760 for ; Fri, 1 Feb 2019 06:08:28 -0500 Received: from e06smtp01.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp01.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.97]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2qcjek0f69-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Fri, 01 Feb 2019 06:08:28 -0500 Received: from localhost by e06smtp01.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Fri, 1 Feb 2019 11:08:26 -0000 Received: from b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.197) by e06smtp01.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.131) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Fri, 1 Feb 2019 11:08:25 -0000 Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.60]) by b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id x11B8NQj66256920 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 1 Feb 2019 11:08:23 GMT Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7443542047; Fri, 1 Feb 2019 11:08:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22D0A4203F; Fri, 1 Feb 2019 11:08:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mschwideX1 (unknown [9.152.212.164]) by d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Fri, 1 Feb 2019 11:08:23 +0000 (GMT) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2019 12:08:22 +0100 From: Martin Schwidefsky To: Heiko Carstens Cc: Tony Krowiak , Sebastian Ott , linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, oberpar@linux.ibm.com, freude@linux.ibm.com, pmorel@linux.ibm.com, pasic@linux.ibm.com, cohuck@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] zcrypt: handle AP Info notification from CHSC SEI command In-Reply-To: <20190201090159.GC3770@osiris> References: <1548870526-30595-1-git-send-email-akrowiak@linux.ibm.com> <88b72363-9dca-4653-c326-9c37b6349a32@linux.ibm.com> <20190201090159.GC3770@osiris> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.13.2 (GTK+ 2.24.30; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 19020111-4275-0000-0000-00000308D086 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 19020111-4276-0000-0000-00003816DE1B Message-Id: <20190201120822.41d39ddb@mschwideX1> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2019-02-01_08:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1902010083 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 1 Feb 2019 10:01:59 +0100 Heiko Carstens wrote: > On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 06:28:39PM -0500, Tony Krowiak wrote: > > On 1/30/19 1:32 PM, Sebastian Ott wrote: > > >On Wed, 30 Jan 2019, Tony Krowiak wrote: > > >>+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ZCRYPT) > > >>+void ap_bus_cfg_chg(void); > > >>+#else > > >>+#error "no CONFIG_ZCRYPT" > > > ^ > > >I don't think that's the right thing to do here. > > > > I'd like to leave it. If somebody edits .config > > and sets CONFIG_ZCRYPT=n, then the build will > > fail. The preprocessor error above tells them > > why. > > No, the kernel build should never fail if a config option is not set. > Also the above should be "#ifdef CONFIG_ZCRYPT". > > In addition (this isn't quoted unfortunately) the alternative function > in the header file is missing the "inline" attribute. Can you please > add that too? > > static inline void ap_bus_cfg_chg(void) { } > > > >>+* A config change has happened, Force an ap bus rescan. > > >>+*/ > > >>+void ap_bus_cfg_chg(void) > > >>+{ > > >>+ AP_DBF(DBF_INFO, "%s config change, forcing bus rescan\n", __func__); > > >>+ > > >>+ ap_bus_force_rescan(); > > >>+} > > >>+EXPORT_SYMBOL(ap_bus_cfg_chg); > > > > > >There is no need for the export symbol - you don't call that function > > >from module code. > > >As an unrelated question, just to be sure: ap_bus.c is compiled as > > >built-in even with ZCRYPT=m, right? > > > > No. If you edit .config and set CONFIG_ZCRYPT=m, ap_bus.c will be built > > into the zcrypt.ko module. Through some other magic, the zcrypt module > > is loaded when linux boots. > > If that happens, then we have a build problem that needs to be > fixed. What exactly are you doing to get the ap code linked into the > zcrypt module? Current upstream code: ap-objs := ap_bus.o ap_card.o ap_queue.o obj-$(subst m,y,$(CONFIG_ZCRYPT)) += ap.o The ap_bus.o file is either not build at all or it is linked into the main kernel image. If ap_bus.o is build then it is guaranteed that CONFIG_ZCRYPT is either "m" or "y". -- blue skies, Martin. "Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.