Received: by 2002:ac0:8c9a:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id r26csp594633ima; Fri, 1 Feb 2019 07:58:57 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN6X3r3MnygCKCTIVwqr5OuV675knFIKd7vzKvsl+9i6m/cmxns+26xB0V/q8BFq6e8Ygdtt X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:4a0c:: with SMTP id w12mr40418352pld.8.1549036737552; Fri, 01 Feb 2019 07:58:57 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1549036737; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=k44XHWcZCXHJhkB4loR6m2ZRrnxraIom2jeeSi0c9ltCdcj9GQ/CdklAHgJPvBWpY4 2c5gTv9ePUt9Yy0YtqiFiNTWpg8lzBCvbbnOYRyb+crRjwnbIfzVcUeenFcUoDDua+rg AAZHHPtMAMWC1BHXREkaQdQI//XR35JLDichPdKADLbJ1sqWCxbivkLcwrRFTmp64qEZ mjIDXZimxfJEfwAH1cU11p3ayP3iaZu4d79dOGi+prHA0HE/jq5mQOzHeEKrtHHEC0H5 1SFHZi4P//M0FNupPjAFtdUIwny9UEN6v/umKo+uJPFL4eems5HlW0reG3Sa/E91ti4e UKCg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:accept-language:in-reply-to:references:message-id :date:thread-index:thread-topic:subject:cc:to:from; bh=RkDQR7kaDY5YAJ3lLvm24jUQu4oDpkaMFVvqQ6cKilw=; b=Wu3PI+a8+EyL35Qs+IOyIRkhcEzUZMipcJuz/dn92E3+gB+5++v1s8942z30wFt1jg wAQA+Mg1105/B0HwXq2ui/wPsmJbwq53vF72B67H5ATsQ/sVOokW+lQsZyMgzriQ8FiB Rtf7UfsBUzzIiuH6TXeqIfGnQoT2Sj6AC98w+/2E3+qtpv9+fuDwou0K6KlYvMhVrDtG qwMaiX7mudWlQdwrLH9ceXpbZSc5S0qnsyLcvhr3ga3RShrIjj6zndVqJqK/etXHzdXh fJSoMNCyUwD6I7xVB8cs6GLmTBqVjkQ0TAP7MM3uNEm3xDCjhepwJcPZwYaXVWRjBPeJ aBpg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id a193si1878946pfa.214.2019.02.01.07.58.42; Fri, 01 Feb 2019 07:58:57 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728084AbfBAP4X convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 1 Feb 2019 10:56:23 -0500 Received: from mx07-00178001.pphosted.com ([62.209.51.94]:17867 "EHLO mx07-00178001.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726172AbfBAP4W (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Feb 2019 10:56:22 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (m0046668.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx07-00178001.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x11FpGw9003434; Fri, 1 Feb 2019 16:56:15 +0100 Received: from beta.dmz-eu.st.com (beta.dmz-eu.st.com [164.129.1.35]) by mx07-00178001.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2qcnvqh1qq-1 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 01 Feb 2019 16:56:15 +0100 Received: from zeta.dmz-eu.st.com (zeta.dmz-eu.st.com [164.129.230.9]) by beta.dmz-eu.st.com (STMicroelectronics) with ESMTP id 7816738; Fri, 1 Feb 2019 15:56:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from Webmail-eu.st.com (sfhdag7node3.st.com [10.75.127.21]) by zeta.dmz-eu.st.com (STMicroelectronics) with ESMTP id 577565126; Fri, 1 Feb 2019 15:56:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from SFHDAG7NODE2.st.com (10.75.127.20) by SFHDAG7NODE3.st.com (10.75.127.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1347.2; Fri, 1 Feb 2019 16:56:13 +0100 Received: from SFHDAG7NODE2.st.com ([fe80::d548:6a8f:2ca4:2090]) by SFHDAG7NODE2.st.com ([fe80::d548:6a8f:2ca4:2090%20]) with mapi id 15.00.1347.000; Fri, 1 Feb 2019 16:56:13 +0100 From: Loic PALLARDY To: YueHaibing , "ohad@wizery.com" , "bjorn.andersson@linaro.org" CC: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org" Subject: RE: [PATCH -next] remoteproc: make rproc_check_carveout_da static Thread-Topic: [PATCH -next] remoteproc: make rproc_check_carveout_da static Thread-Index: AQHUudxGKL1acz/0tEqjRTyTD6T3sKXLGQjw Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2019 15:56:13 +0000 Message-ID: <519ceef457d744e98659a2c7aa6fdd4d@SFHDAG7NODE2.st.com> References: <20190201031317.18820-1-yuehaibing@huawei.com> In-Reply-To: <20190201031317.18820-1-yuehaibing@huawei.com> Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted x-originating-ip: [10.75.127.44] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2019-02-01_11:,, signatures=0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Yue, > -----Original Message----- > From: linux-remoteproc-owner@vger.kernel.org owner@vger.kernel.org> On Behalf Of YueHaibing > Sent: vendredi 1 f?vrier 2019 04:13 > To: ohad@wizery.com; bjorn.andersson@linaro.org > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org; > YueHaibing > Subject: [PATCH -next] remoteproc: make rproc_check_carveout_da static > > Fixes the following sparse warnings: > > drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c:279:5: warning: > symbol 'rproc_check_carveout_da' was not declared. Should it be static? Correction already sent on ML few weeks ago. See [1] Regards, Loic [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10755763/ > > Signed-off-by: YueHaibing > --- > drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 5 +++-- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c > b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c > index 54ec38f..5d4954d 100644 > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c > @@ -276,8 +276,9 @@ rproc_find_carveout_by_name(struct rproc *rproc, > const char *name, ...) > * > * Return: 0 if carveout match request else -ENOMEM > */ > -int rproc_check_carveout_da(struct rproc *rproc, struct rproc_mem_entry > *mem, > - u32 da, u32 len) > +static int rproc_check_carveout_da(struct rproc *rproc, > + struct rproc_mem_entry *mem, > + u32 da, u32 len) > { > struct device *dev = &rproc->dev; > int delta = 0; > -- > 2.7.0 >