Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>
To:     Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
CC:     Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "Yu, Fenghua" <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
        "Chatre, Reinette" <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] x86: avoid confusion over the new RESCTRL config prompt
Thread-Topic: [PATCH] x86: avoid confusion over the new RESCTRL config prompt
Thread-Index: AQHUuCejcDpsRrChaU6VvVuhWFd9jqXIjHsAgAAJQICAACvQgIACk0mw
Date:   Fri, 1 Feb 2019 19:18:35 +0000
Message-ID: <3908561D78D1C84285E8C5FCA982C28F7D4E216D@ORSMSX110.amr.corp.intel.com>
References: <20190129225218.15441-1-hannes@cmpxchg.org>
 <20190129230845.GG28773@zn.tnic> <20190130164626.GA17841@cmpxchg.org>
 <20190130171933.GC21221@zn.tnic> <20190130195621.GA30653@cmpxchg.org>
In-Reply-To: <20190130195621.GA30653@cmpxchg.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
dlp-product: dlpe-windows
dlp-version: 11.0.400.15
dlp-reaction: no-action
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

>> What about
>> 
>> s/X86_RESCTRL/X86_CPU_RESCTRL/g
>
> Good idea.
>
> Tony, Babu, that look okay to you guys as well?

For now.  But very soon we will also have ARM_CPU_RESCTRL, and some of
this code will become generic.  Will we need an arch-independent name for the
bits of code shared by arm and x86?  

-Tony