Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   Vineet Gupta <vineet.gupta1@synopsys.com>
To:     Eugeniy Paltsev <eugeniy.paltsev@synopsys.com>,
        "linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org" 
        <linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org>
CC:     Alexey Brodkin <alexey.brodkin@synopsys.com>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] ARCv2: introduce unaligned access under a
 Kconfig option
Thread-Topic: [PATCH v2 2/5] ARCv2: introduce unaligned access under a
 Kconfig option
Thread-Index: AQHUuoXgAZHBPd/yM06NsivaDTeWvg==
Date:   Fri, 1 Feb 2019 23:36:59 +0000
Message-ID: <C2D7FE5348E1B147BCA15975FBA23075014642E698@US01WEMBX2.internal.synopsys.com>
References: <20190130163244.10870-1-Eugeniy.Paltsev@synopsys.com>
 <20190130163244.10870-3-Eugeniy.Paltsev@synopsys.com>
 <f95135f7-20e3-1897-d3dc-e8dadf8a2ac5@synopsys.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 2/1/19 3:28 PM, Vineet Gupta wrote:=0A=
> Guess there's no solution to this. We could force select the option in re=
levant=0A=
> Kconfig, but this applies to pretty much every platform and defeats the p=
urpose of=0A=
> option in first place.=0A=
=0A=
Answering my own question:=0A=
=0A=
#if defined(__ARC_UNALIGNED__) && !defined(CONFIG_ARC_USE_UNALIGNED_MEM_ACC=
ESS)=0A=
BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(1, "gcc doesn't support disabling unaligned accesses");=0A=
#endif=0A=