Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Sat, 2 Feb 2019 01:06:15 +0100
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
To:     "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc:     Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
        Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "Yu, Fenghua" <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
        "Chatre, Reinette" <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: avoid confusion over the new RESCTRL config prompt
Message-ID: <20190202000615.GA15335@zn.tnic>
References: <20190129225218.15441-1-hannes@cmpxchg.org>
 <20190129230845.GG28773@zn.tnic>
 <20190130164626.GA17841@cmpxchg.org>
 <20190130171933.GC21221@zn.tnic>
 <20190130195621.GA30653@cmpxchg.org>
 <3908561D78D1C84285E8C5FCA982C28F7D4E216D@ORSMSX110.amr.corp.intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <3908561D78D1C84285E8C5FCA982C28F7D4E216D@ORSMSX110.amr.corp.intel.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Feb 01, 2019 at 07:18:35PM +0000, Luck, Tony wrote:
> For now.  But very soon we will also have ARM_CPU_RESCTRL, and some of
> this code will become generic.  Will we need an arch-independent name for the
> bits of code shared by arm and x86?

Yes. The idea still is to have the arch-specific stuff under
X86_CPU_RESCTRL and ARM_CPU_RESCTRL respectively, and the arch-agnostic
pieces under CPU_RESCTRL.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)