Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 1 Apr 2001 19:24:04 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 1 Apr 2001 19:23:54 -0400 Received: from mandrakesoft.mandrakesoft.com ([216.71.84.35]:39976 "EHLO mandrakesoft.mandrakesoft.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 1 Apr 2001 19:23:46 -0400 Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2001 18:21:29 -0500 (CDT) From: Jeff Garzik To: David Lang cc: Manfred Spraul , "Albert D. Cahalan" , lm@bitmover.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: bug database braindump from the kernel summit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 1 Apr 2001, David Lang wrote: > if we want to get the .config as part of the report then we need to make > it part of the kernel in some standard way (the old /proc/config flamewar) > it's difficult enough sometimes for the sysadmin of a box to know what > kernel is running on it, let alone a bug reporting script. Let's hope it's not a flamewar, but here goes :) We -need- .config, but /proc/config seems like pure bloat. If a sysadmin (note I don't say "user") has no clue what his kernel config is, or has no clue what kernel is running on his box, then they should be fired before the day is out. Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/