Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 4 Nov 2000 15:43:47 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 4 Nov 2000 15:43:38 -0500 Received: from lightning.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.1]:17192 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 4 Nov 2000 15:43:05 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: Negative scalability by removal of lock_kernel()?(Was:Strange To: dean-list-linux-kernel@arctic.org (dean gaudet) Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2000 20:43:41 +0000 (GMT) Cc: andrewm@uow.edu.au (Andrew Morton), kumon@flab.fujitsu.co.jp, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: from "dean gaudet" at Nov 04, 2000 12:11:11 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL1] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > sysv semaphores have a very unfortunate negative feature -- if the admin > kill -9's the server (impatient admins do this all the time) then you end > up leaving a semaphore lying around. sysvsem don't have the usual unix Umm they have SEM_UNDO. Its a case of deeper magic - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/