Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262451AbUCHLHU (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Mar 2004 06:07:20 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262453AbUCHLHU (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Mar 2004 06:07:20 -0500 Received: from fw.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:61668 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262451AbUCHLHT (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Mar 2004 06:07:19 -0500 Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2004 03:07:22 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: "Amit S. Kale" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, trini@kernel.crashing.org, george@mvista.com, pavel@ucw.cz Subject: Re: kgdb for mainline kernel: core-lite [patch 1/3] Message-Id: <20040308030722.01948c93.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <200403081619.16771.amitkale@emsyssoft.com> References: <200403081504.30840.amitkale@emsyssoft.com> <200403081545.09916.amitkale@emsyssoft.com> <20040308022602.766be828.akpm@osdl.org> <200403081619.16771.amitkale@emsyssoft.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1408 Lines: 33 "Amit S. Kale" wrote: > > On Monday 08 Mar 2004 3:56 pm, Andrew Morton wrote: > > "Amit S. Kale" wrote: > > > Here are features that are present only in full kgdb: > > > 1. Thread support (aka info threads) > > > > argh, disaster. I discussed this with Tom a week or so ago when it looked > > like this it was being chopped out and I recall being told that the > > discussion was referring to something else. > > > > Ho-hum, sorry. Can we please put this back in? > > Err., well this is one of the particularly dirty parts of kgdb. That's why > it's been kept away. It takes care of correct thread backtraces in some rare > cases. Let me just make sure we're taking about the same thing here. Are you saying that with kgdb-lite, `info threads' is completely missing, or does it just not work correctly with threads (as opposed to heavyweight processes)? > If you consider it an absolutely must, we can do something so that the dirty > part is kept away and info threads almost always works. Yes, I'd consider `info threads' support a must-have. I'm rather surprised that others do not? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/