Received: by 2002:ac0:8c9a:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id r26csp3544521ima; Mon, 4 Feb 2019 00:46:47 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AHgI3IavaHYroShlQrc3jSJL05KIqF391OoxbTFMuvs7hy0W8WUHhhR2VFQEJLEkyR68q0pt60x/ X-Received: by 2002:a63:e711:: with SMTP id b17mr11853220pgi.363.1549270007333; Mon, 04 Feb 2019 00:46:47 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1549270007; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=SmyokW1Kqn98UwkzIEk/NGCoC0C80Y+7JN+DuDBsVU8K5SUqDYDrb5h0a8yRF2ATYi U/n6Mpxrb8qV6DEeTRY0Qw0fvbczY3bYTy7OXo/JQ/huhQosfXs/ox37w7WiitaprrOK /08AhUOJEPfyDfuZF6DH47Z5mHqMysO/F9jf5linqeJCJLt3tX8Oy0KCp3rl9rnZAvwR tszmbW4iEQ83NeeOaRj6XvK+LpPc3iTpdmeek6MruTPPMCiJaFBm4W44eDxus/Xs71MI eZ/eXnXNuBZqosBCNt9d0HmoHsZxxRvmJjP39G4UnTqoL9HF3zuWYufAbCh8cxj/ky93 Cg+Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=+50uRYFZwEAUM0hQa1bPoTyv103SwogYd4svn7yNTLg=; b=H1IU4rvktIh4weYhxpL/l+uTRtecW4M6o+eUI9X+Mt1iAQMIibs+TALPi7vFM/I7LW SB/x1qyNLqI5KM8IATduTKsQF3Kh7Wd2FPd897bC+SbZrRZ45d3d7MhvFw54dXeJLVqN 3goO29gBCzP3DrF6X5DrnaqUamO3AWSIOlhL5oCO8aDADM/9EvABLpqRi5A1x/UE9Ynx Z0z+9m7QKbCexc6qI9+mHox3eRTx8QGZWWOhL27GUyV/RDq0LoIfjjqGBf7k6PwEP4EX bC4OpmSycRgJc1u46j77JkMZT54kNzOgDloFVIgnryQUKqbkGGDmJ5Ao2d5MdxOoJvwe G1cg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id h3si3719773pgl.468.2019.02.04.00.46.04; Mon, 04 Feb 2019 00:46:47 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728223AbfBDIai (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 4 Feb 2019 03:30:38 -0500 Received: from mail-lf1-f66.google.com ([209.85.167.66]:35620 "EHLO mail-lf1-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726727AbfBDIah (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Feb 2019 03:30:37 -0500 Received: by mail-lf1-f66.google.com with SMTP id l142so1694895lfe.2; Mon, 04 Feb 2019 00:30:36 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=+50uRYFZwEAUM0hQa1bPoTyv103SwogYd4svn7yNTLg=; b=RsK9rucUPjp0K83TzXQJsP2S3EBbzDYbFksXnx2AIRM77e4BfV1hoDc6YMoMiR7o6T JMAbxhhp6MvDhGHs3846x0czsSP4m8SMrsvlVONy3mtHoNaYyBulbVq5mB3tegvAlImS qyZX7YBRFnF0AUpdsIuhk5Ycw0oHYX56ONQVPsoLPWu1HHsYIexudFb3JRe1GHyn2/Bb LZ8R73avRa9PNf+1uxIHVZGImYAgCUII5xBe3E9YXnNBJDnBd/0sDgeHcton4NBvAl8Q i6Nwta37BtMhTmH6duWBCJX+EdGSV8HkU88/etoWhc9cOB43rBMGdEOfm5XBIFxMeL6x hrGw== X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukfkZfxgQ4rCqctrYWPJIa993Dl0fmnZXt4miokT2EzqjRJQPO+f o08XZOYfbcY3I9AXiuH89VQ= X-Received: by 2002:a19:c115:: with SMTP id r21mr38239917lff.144.1549269035284; Mon, 04 Feb 2019 00:30:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from xi.terra (c-74bee655.07-184-6d6c6d4.bbcust.telenor.se. [85.230.190.116]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y82sm6356lfd.17.2019.02.04.00.30.34 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 04 Feb 2019 00:30:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from johan by xi.terra with local (Exim 4.91) (envelope-from ) id 1gqZeC-0004hi-MU; Mon, 04 Feb 2019 09:30:32 +0100 Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2019 09:30:32 +0100 From: Johan Hovold To: Andreas Kemnade Cc: Johan Hovold , mark.rutland@arm.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, letux-kernel@openphoenux.org, tony@atomide.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, bcousson@baylibre.com, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] arm: dts: gta04: add gps support Message-ID: <20190204083032.GB4686@localhost> References: <20190131180640.14480-1-andreas@kemnade.info> <20190131180640.14480-3-andreas@kemnade.info> <20190201100416.GD3691@localhost> <20190201200630.2efc9eef@kemnade.info> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190201200630.2efc9eef@kemnade.info> User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.2 (2019-01-07) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Feb 01, 2019 at 08:06:30PM +0100, Andreas Kemnade wrote: > On Fri, 1 Feb 2019 11:04:16 +0100 > Johan Hovold wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 07:06:40PM +0100, Andreas Kemnade wrote: > > > The GTA04 has a w2sg0004 or w2sg0084 gps chip. Not detectable > > > which one is mounted so use the compatibility entry for w2sg0004 > > > for all which will work for both. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Andreas Kemnade > > > --- > > > Changes in v3: > > > - converted to a patchset > > > - added vcc-supply > > > > > > Changes in v2: > > > - some s/gps/gnss/ > > > - not added vcc-supply because the regulator is not modelled > > > in dts at all > > > > > > w2sg0004 bindings are in next-20190129 > > > > > > arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-gta04.dtsi | 14 ++++++++++++++ > > > 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+) > > > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-gta04.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-gta04.dtsi > > > index 02d8274a2f47..4ea0f7dc37c6 100644 > > > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-gta04.dtsi > > > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-gta04.dtsi > > > @@ -320,6 +320,12 @@ > > > >; > > > }; > > > > > > + gps_pins: pinmux_gps_pins { > > > > s/gps/gnss/ would be more consistent, but whatever. > > > well, gps is already in the file at another place. So it is a bit > inconsistent in any case, without further cleanup. If someone comes > up with a strong opinion here I would of course change it. Up to you. As long as the gnss node is named "gnss" I don't have a strong opinion on the other names (as long as they follow the spec of course). Johan