Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2004 08:22:14 -0700
From: Tom Rini <trini@kernel.crashing.org>
To: "Amit S. Kale" <amitkale@emsyssoft.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
       george@mvista.com, pavel@ucw.cz
Subject: Re: kgdb for mainline kernel: core-lite [patch 1/3]
Message-ID: <20040308152214.GE15065@smtp.west.cox.net>
References: <200403081504.30840.amitkale@emsyssoft.com> <200403081619.16771.amitkale@emsyssoft.com> <20040308030722.01948c93.akpm@osdl.org> <200403081650.18641.amitkale@emsyssoft.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <200403081650.18641.amitkale@emsyssoft.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 998
Lines: 25

On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 04:50:18PM +0530, Amit S. Kale wrote:
> On Monday 08 Mar 2004 4:37 pm, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > "Amit S. Kale" <amitkale@emsyssoft.com> wrote:
[snip]
> > >  If you consider it an absolutely must, we can do something so that the
> > > dirty part is kept away and info threads almost always works.
> >
> > Yes, I'd consider `info threads' support a must-have.  I'm rather surprised
> > that others do not?
> 
> Present threads support code changes calling convention of do_IRQ. Most 
> believe that to be an absolute no.

I believe that George's version does something totally different, with
some macros at compile time (and binutils support, I _think_) to not
have to change do_IRQ.

-- 
Tom Rini
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/