Received: by 2002:ac0:8c9a:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id r26csp3617358ima; Mon, 4 Feb 2019 02:11:10 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN4YHW/GUcmXiUPihKVoXngJ0e93tfmDfftk/1ShpJGkofmCkpmkW9yx3tKt/hZouJidmaou X-Received: by 2002:a62:39cb:: with SMTP id u72mr50274990pfj.223.1549275070361; Mon, 04 Feb 2019 02:11:10 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1549275070; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=0bikVQkAnu4EG+zO8pfI/Z3MEkHAyBpQbnihnss10kyk8PZ8ov9rZ0jNhZhvtY0UCc 9JnzZfMv8fEGz5X3jS9iHX6l4QXzHkszPO49kAJzlY+Alq4fqqfTl4umBfR2HYVJpzDa WLMk3UGcbznfw0xPjuHYubzjBXeMFyB9OfhDpRQubnO/1N2Z0w9aH0py/C5lWNNsiTi3 QvRwt5t4G4WN9Oxfd9SV42igmc18MmHaBqD6qJPaUPwy4pKUNV8W0MAo3tCR/ytm9pb+ VtVFYoSJhZtfg+XY024qzksSxnaEkzlECBdlhk3E0pQTgXaXrd2Pl+4K38xtMprcQOpV vBjg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:message-id:content-language :content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :from:references:cc:to:subject; bh=oeNWvO6ApPkRBi+HtHayW3rghjQNf3ghelpyNhmvq34=; b=D610p5px7kC17K71wi8Ag54zdXwJysiAuQmLVl9Nx9Nn4dGzREUTdELFkWiRXmCyQS TYyX5iiwS9oteLZ546ZusErfKUXfyTUYzdsJ5bvPQNW7qB0hhC0f2EVMSlt2GQYim2hI VjUAxchLUVez5s1bWlGIMs6AuCu3JkYIIqUz+OGbNYWVwVL2O8QNjuxvuQM2o/G5dbto BojkA/rBoc3mgHe7PQP79zmFpm4Jv+0O92nLVJ48hwRLsDKf6VYQXBEcwosRNUc01Aly SN4kELFcBa1ztn/mUzCPHNxnZGG91W74/0NftDM0qKcwLfhJFflfr6giCZL8I+gyVutY Peyw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id d8si2547171pgl.386.2019.02.04.02.10.54; Mon, 04 Feb 2019 02:11:10 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729259AbfBDKGS (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 4 Feb 2019 05:06:18 -0500 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:48332 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727217AbfBDKGR (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Feb 2019 05:06:17 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098413.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x149t5iQ113373 for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2019 05:06:16 -0500 Received: from e06smtp05.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp05.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.101]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2qejxx9dc2-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 04 Feb 2019 05:06:16 -0500 Received: from localhost by e06smtp05.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Mon, 4 Feb 2019 10:06:14 -0000 Received: from b06cxnps4074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.196) by e06smtp05.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.135) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Mon, 4 Feb 2019 10:06:13 -0000 Received: from d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.232]) by b06cxnps4074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id x14A6BHx2228626 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 4 Feb 2019 10:06:11 GMT Received: from d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F9675204E; Mon, 4 Feb 2019 10:06:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [10.0.2.15] (unknown [9.152.224.114]) by d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA2CB52050; Mon, 4 Feb 2019 10:06:10 +0000 (GMT) Subject: Re: [PATCH] zcrypt: handle AP Info notification from CHSC SEI command To: Tony Krowiak , Heiko Carstens Cc: Sebastian Ott , linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Martin Schwidefsky , oberpar@linux.ibm.com, pmorel@linux.ibm.com, pasic@linux.ibm.com, cohuck@redhat.com References: <1548870526-30595-1-git-send-email-akrowiak@linux.ibm.com> <88b72363-9dca-4653-c326-9c37b6349a32@linux.ibm.com> <20190201090159.GC3770@osiris> From: Harald Freudenberger Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2019 11:06:13 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 19020410-0020-0000-0000-0000031148A3 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 19020410-0021-0000-0000-000021625365 Message-Id: X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2019-02-04_07:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1902040080 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 01.02.19 16:38, Tony Krowiak wrote: > On 2/1/19 4:01 AM, Heiko Carstens wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 06:28:39PM -0500, Tony Krowiak wrote: >>> On 1/30/19 1:32 PM, Sebastian Ott wrote: >>>> On Wed, 30 Jan 2019, Tony Krowiak wrote: >>>>> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ZCRYPT) >>>>> +void ap_bus_cfg_chg(void); >>>>> +#else >>>>> +#error "no CONFIG_ZCRYPT" >>>>     ^ >>>> I don't think that's the right thing to do here. >>> >>> I'd like to leave it. If somebody edits .config >>> and sets CONFIG_ZCRYPT=n, then the build will >>> fail. The preprocessor error above tells them >>> why. >> >> No, the kernel build should never fail if a config option is not set. >> Also the above should be "#ifdef CONFIG_ZCRYPT". > > Will do. > >> >> In addition (this isn't quoted unfortunately) the alternative function >> in the header file is missing the "inline" attribute. Can you please >> add that too? > > I can. > >> >> static inline void ap_bus_cfg_chg(void) { } >> >>>>> +* A config change has happened, Force an ap bus rescan. >>>>> +*/ >>>>> +void ap_bus_cfg_chg(void) >>>>> +{ >>>>> +    AP_DBF(DBF_INFO, "%s config change, forcing bus rescan\n", __func__); >>>>> + >>>>> +    ap_bus_force_rescan(); >>>>> +} >>>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(ap_bus_cfg_chg); >>>> >>>> There is no need for the export symbol - you don't call that function >>> >from module code. >>>> As an unrelated question, just to be sure: ap_bus.c is compiled as >>>> built-in even with ZCRYPT=m, right? >>> >>> No. If you edit .config and set CONFIG_ZCRYPT=m, ap_bus.c will be built >>> into the zcrypt.ko module. Through some other magic, the zcrypt module >>> is loaded when linux boots. >> >> If that happens, then we have a build problem that needs to be >> fixed. What exactly are you doing to get the ap code linked into the >> zcrypt module? > > To tell you the truth, I don't know. The build configuration precedes my > creating this patch by many years. I only discovered these anomalies by > playing with the CONFIG_ZCRYPT option in response to Sebastian's > comments. I will have to take this up with our internal IBM maintainer. > >> > As Martin already pointed out the ap bus code is statically build into the kernel with this line in the Makefile:   obj-$(subst m,y,$(CONFIG_ZCRYPT)) += ap.o So CONFIG_ZCRYPT may have the value 'm' or 'y' and this is also the reason why a simple #ifdef CONFIG_ZCRYPT does not work, instead #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ZCRYPT) has to be used. Only the ap stuff (which is: ap_bus.o, ap_card.o and ap_queue.o) is statically build into the kernel. The zcrypt kernel module is loaded as a dependency when a crypto card is detected. So detecting a CEX4 forces kernel module zcrypt_cex4.ko which forces the zcrypt.ko to insert into the kernel. So all global functions in ap_bus.c are available when CONFIG_ZCRYPT is enabled. However, I thought the symbol still needs an EXPORT_SYMBOL() statement. Otherwise I should throw out all these statements. Harald