Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Mon, 4 Feb 2019 06:42:43 -0800
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To:     David Kozub <zub@linux.fjfi.cvut.cz>
Cc:     Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
        Jonathan Derrick <jonathan.derrick@intel.com>,
        Scott Bauer <sbauer@plzdonthack.me>,
        linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Jonas Rabenstein <jonas.rabenstein@studium.uni-erlangen.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 01/16] block: sed-opal: fix typos and formatting
Message-ID: <20190204144243.GA31132@infradead.org>
References: <1549054223-12220-1-git-send-email-zub@linux.fjfi.cvut.cz>
 <1549054223-12220-2-git-send-email-zub@linux.fjfi.cvut.cz>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1549054223-12220-2-git-send-email-zub@linux.fjfi.cvut.cz>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.2 (2017-12-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Feb 01, 2019 at 09:50:08PM +0100, David Kozub wrote:
> This should make no change in functionality.
> The formatting changes were triggered by checkpatch.pl.
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Kozub <zub@linux.fjfi.cvut.cz>
> Reviewed-by: Scott Bauer <sbauer@plzdonthack.me>
> ---
>  block/sed-opal.c | 19 +++++++++++--------
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/block/sed-opal.c b/block/sed-opal.c
> index e0de4dd448b3..c882a193e162 100644
> --- a/block/sed-opal.c
> +++ b/block/sed-opal.c
> @@ -11,8 +11,8 @@
>   *
>   * This program is distributed in the hope it will be useful, but WITHOUT
>   * ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or
> - * FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the GNU General Public License for
> - * more details.
> + * FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the GNU General Public License
> + * for more details.

What exactly is the fix here?

If we want to fix the licence boilerplate we should switch it to an
SPDX tag instead.

Otherwise this looks fine to me.