Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Mon, 4 Feb 2019 17:36:19 +0100
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To:     "Ghannam, Yazen" <Yazen.Ghannam@amd.com>
Cc:     "linux-edac@vger.kernel.org" <linux-edac@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "tony.luck@intel.com" <tony.luck@intel.com>,
        "x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] EDAC, mce_amd: Print ExtErrorCode and description on
 a single line
Message-ID: <20190204163618.GF29639@zn.tnic>
References: <20190201225534.8177-1-Yazen.Ghannam@amd.com>
 <20190201225534.8177-6-Yazen.Ghannam@amd.com>
 <20190203122158.GA21750@zn.tnic>
 <BN7PR12MB2593CF4ABBC4ECFCDE87FC7AF86D0@BN7PR12MB2593.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <BN7PR12MB2593CF4ABBC4ECFCDE87FC7AF86D0@BN7PR12MB2593.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Feb 04, 2019 at 03:14:27PM +0000, Ghannam, Yazen wrote:
> Yes, you're right. But it seems that the next pr_* that's not a pr_cont will be on
> a newline automatically.

Ah, that must be that printk continuation fun around

  4bcc595ccd80 ("printk: reinstate KERN_CONT for printing continuation lines")

> Should I add an explicit newline just to be sure we get one?

Nah, no need. If anything, we should strive to get rid of KERN_CONT, if
possible.

Thx.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.