Received: by 2002:ac0:8c9a:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id r26csp4895658ima; Tue, 5 Feb 2019 03:08:18 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AHgI3IbSAXOrTQnBdt4my0ZUkMzh/Y02efBZ0M/O/wcWE+WDDMtk6HEMtSHTkzGKDafUhUEskyNa X-Received: by 2002:a63:990a:: with SMTP id d10mr4010006pge.279.1549364898065; Tue, 05 Feb 2019 03:08:18 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1549364898; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ff7AhAmCRwKpGZ5vq85TtS9vfPVd1kUMz60o7ZGHzjd4+3knDw8qaI1JNd3JZUNhU9 QxI8qMwZ4E+dKCNim6FeGAKxnzqe1JaoOJagM3FbAaBX4oyPHq+XaeBiAOunbCCGN8ou urUyPZDqR130HQ4IJyUbC8QJa+HBPW/kIBAhRPTaqIRo8i0gbxU36tty0IbEMbBgd96P gmiUkE+GMk38wlNQituGQVuBn4Qp5bFkaZTeFyp4Q+tz2mSwZKXv4IG8e4m1VQ5DgUPs wjkyGPJaUW8WM3jibHcjmEG2GgrwJ3H14KbcyGLwbd93qZDIgVbcIMcU8II/auUlc26K Qv5Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :dlp-reaction:dlp-version:dlp-product:content-language :accept-language:in-reply-to:references:message-id:date:thread-index :thread-topic:subject:cc:to:from; bh=KmIjwHLGrbMOarD8iJ/dnYHRk4Hp7x3B524RxQ3Kr4E=; b=lWJzjFarz0rdi/HUMWverEguVbm+BiIUJKpa1X55VLDFIZmmyFVslBn+aG33S1TD6V 1fgCeIYiuo+FD5eLfrCAiG4OPHlR6MSBlV3rykK32TuyXObgGgKfP9e+BdehbEnHAHp2 mTCuliquIwJ5b8F8GzSGDreo7FQtcI/pQ6N9pimvRifpd488icLVZAOAdlUggTWNnP32 kUfsQYdJ/+Ve7TB3qRUwMy771vCEWNyDgX+n4dSxALRxAl3n2ChDcCRiHJa6E8W2XIse OqgErXaVo+RVGS+DmnJ644YbhbbeOD+LVoaaagRxq3ku5QL9UQnITU7x6hvr98R91DXG lncQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id y10si2838963plt.406.2019.02.05.03.08.02; Tue, 05 Feb 2019 03:08:18 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728557AbfBELH0 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 5 Feb 2019 06:07:26 -0500 Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]:21393 "EHLO mga01.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727776AbfBELHZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Feb 2019 06:07:25 -0500 X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 05 Feb 2019 03:07:24 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.56,563,1539673200"; d="scan'208";a="136021718" Received: from fmsmsx105.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.18.124.203]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 05 Feb 2019 03:07:24 -0800 Received: from fmsmsx111.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.116.5) by FMSMSX105.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.124.203) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.408.0; Tue, 5 Feb 2019 03:07:23 -0800 Received: from hasmsx111.ger.corp.intel.com (10.184.198.39) by fmsmsx111.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.116.5) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.408.0; Tue, 5 Feb 2019 03:07:22 -0800 Received: from hasmsx108.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.9.55]) by HASMSX111.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.5.16]) with mapi id 14.03.0415.000; Tue, 5 Feb 2019 13:07:17 +0200 From: "Winkler, Tomas" To: Jarkko Sakkinen , "linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org" CC: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org" , "stable@vger.kernel.org" , James Morris , Jerry Snitselaar Subject: RE: [PATCH v3] tpm/tpm_crb: Avoid unaligned reads in crb_recv() Thread-Topic: [PATCH v3] tpm/tpm_crb: Avoid unaligned reads in crb_recv() Thread-Index: AQHUvUDUPtSrjGtlHk6wCuMRxetyu6XRCy8A Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2019 11:07:16 +0000 Message-ID: <5B8DA87D05A7694D9FA63FD143655C1B9DA90A8B@hasmsx108.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <20190205105136.3086-1-jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <20190205105136.3086-1-jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: dlp-product: dlpe-windows dlp-version: 11.0.400.15 dlp-reaction: no-action x-originating-ip: [10.12.126.72] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > The current approach to read first 6 bytes from the response and then tail of > the response, can cause the 2nd memcpy_fromio() to do an unaligned read > (e.g. read 32-bit word from address aligned to a 16-bits), depending on how > memcpy_fromio() is implemented. If this happens, the read will fail and the > memory controller will fill the read with 1's. > > This was triggered by 170d13ca3a2f, which should be probably refined to check > and react to the address alignment. Before that commit, on x86 > memcpy_fromio() turned out to be memcpy(). By a luck GCC has done the right > thing (from tpm_crb's perspective) for us so far, but we should not rely on that. > Thus, it makes sense to fix this also in tpm_crb, not least because the fix can be > then backported to stable kernels and make them more robust when compiled > in differing environments. > > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org > Cc: James Morris > Cc: Tomas Winkler > Cc: Jerry Snitselaar > Fixes: 30fc8d138e91 ("tpm: TPM 2.0 CRB Interface") > Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen > Reviewed-by: Jerry Snitselaar > --- > v3: > * Fix typo i.e. %s/reminding/remaining/g Why you haven't fixed all the typos I've pointed out? I think you missed that. Tomas > v2: > * There was a trailing double colon in the end of the short summary. > * Check requested and expected length against TPM_HEADER_SIZE. > * Add some explanatory comments to crb_recv(). > drivers/char/tpm/tpm_crb.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++------ > 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_crb.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_crb.c index > 36952ef98f90..ee4df7815912 100644 > --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_crb.c > +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_crb.c > @@ -287,19 +287,29 @@ static int crb_recv(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 *buf, > size_t count) > struct crb_priv *priv = dev_get_drvdata(&chip->dev); > unsigned int expected; > > - /* sanity check */ > - if (count < 6) > + /* A sanity check that the upper layer wants to get at least the header > + * as that is the minimum size for any TPM response. > + */ > + if (count < TPM_HEADER_SIZE) > return -EIO; > > + /* If this bit is set, according to the spec, the TPM is in unrecovable > + * condition. > + */ > if (ioread32(&priv->regs_t->ctrl_sts) & CRB_CTRL_STS_ERROR) > return -EIO; > > - memcpy_fromio(buf, priv->rsp, 6); > - expected = be32_to_cpup((__be32 *) &buf[2]); > - if (expected > count || expected < 6) > + /* Read 8 bytes (not just 6 bytes, which would cover the response > length > + * field) in order to make sure that the remaining memory accesses > will > + * be aligned. > + */ > + memcpy_fromio(buf, priv->rsp, 8); > + > + expected = be32_to_cpup((__be32 *)&buf[2]); > + if (expected > count || expected < TPM_HEADER_SIZE) > return -EIO; > > - memcpy_fromio(&buf[6], &priv->rsp[6], expected - 6); > + memcpy_fromio(&buf[8], &priv->rsp[8], expected - 8); > > return expected; > } > -- > 2.19.1