Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] Revert
 "scsi: ufs: disable vccq if it's not needed by UFS device"
To:     Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
Cc:     Marc Gonzalez <marc.w.gonzalez@free.fr>,
        MSM <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Jeffrey Hugo <jhugo@codeaurora.org>,
        Andy Gross <andy.gross@linaro.org>,
        David Brown <david.brown@linaro.org>,
        Evan Green <evgreen@chromium.org>,
        Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>,
        Avri Altman <avri.altman@wdc.com>,
        Pedro Sousa <pedrom.sousa@synopsys.com>,
        Subhash Jadavani <subhashj@codeaurora.org>,
        Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
        SCSI <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
From:   Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>
Message-ID: <b190a7f0-eec9-3e87-f9c7-4969e05590df@samsung.com>
Date:   Tue, 5 Feb 2019 16:22:50 +0530
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
        Thunderbird/60.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20190205062720.GF31919@minitux>
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
CMS-TYPE: 105P
References: <e3c82a49-c601-effc-348f-f768656c659f@free.fr>
        <CGME20190204174549epcas4p4682667176f55101f69cc24cc455c9f3c@epcas4p4.samsung.com>
        <70618c25-83f0-b9db-51a3-c1d74b605a45@free.fr>
        <5f2a8378-1f22-6a52-356d-56d3b393ab1d@samsung.com>
        <20190205062720.GF31919@minitux>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi Bjorn,

On 05/02/19 11:57 AM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Mon 04 Feb 20:58 PST 2019, Alim Akhtar wrote:
> 
>> Hi Marc,
>>
>> On 04/02/19 11:12 PM, Marc Gonzalez wrote:
>>> This reverts commit 60f0187031c05e04cbadffb62f557d0ff3564490.
>>>
>>> Calling ufshcd_set_vccq_rail_unused hangs my system.
>>> It seems vccq is not *not* needed.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Marc Gonzalez <marc.w.gonzalez@free.fr>
>>> ---
>>
>> AFAIK Samsung and Toshiba UFS devices does not use VCCQ (this pin is
>> either floating or connected to Ground, at least on the devices that I
>> have worked on).
> 
> But why does such system define a vccq-supply? If the system doesn't
> have a regulator connected to VCCQ, then the UFS driver shouldn't be
> told that there is one. And if VCCQ is optional the UFS driver should
> support the fact that this regulator might not be supplied (i.e. call
> regulator_get_optional() and handle the error indicating that the supply
> isn't specified).
> 
As per JESD220C, chapter 6.1, it does says "VCCQ - Supply voltage used 
typically for the memory controller and optionally for the PHY 
interface, the memory IO, and any other internal very low voltage block"
And we have VCCQ2 - which serve the pretty much same purpose. The 
voltage range for VCCQ and VCCQ2 are different, VCCQ has a lower voltage 
suitable to some low voltage block inside UFS device. I think this is 
design consideration which allow some vendor to use one less physical 
pin may be. And also depends on the voltage requirements of some of the 
internal circuit.


> Regards,
> Bjorn
> 
>> You said your system hanged, I believe you have set UFS_DEVICE_NO_VCCQ
>> quirks, in that case VCCQ regulator should having been disabled.
>> So you mean your system hanged because vccq regulator got disabled?
>>
>>>    drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs.h    |  1 -
>>>    drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 59 +++------------------------------------
>>>    2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 56 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs.h b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs.h
>>> index dd65fea07687..7da7318eb6a6 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs.h
>>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs.h
>>> @@ -514,7 +514,6 @@ struct ufs_vreg {
>>>    	struct regulator *reg;
>>>    	const char *name;
>>>    	bool enabled;
>>> -	bool unused;
>>>    	int min_uV;
>>>    	int max_uV;
>>>    	int min_uA;
>>> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
>>> index 9ba7671b84f8..8b9a01073d62 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
>>> @@ -245,7 +245,6 @@ static int ufshcd_probe_hba(struct ufs_hba *hba);
>>>    static int __ufshcd_setup_clocks(struct ufs_hba *hba, bool on,
>>>    				 bool skip_ref_clk);
>>>    static int ufshcd_setup_clocks(struct ufs_hba *hba, bool on);
>>> -static int ufshcd_set_vccq_rail_unused(struct ufs_hba *hba, bool unused);
>>>    static int ufshcd_uic_hibern8_exit(struct ufs_hba *hba);
>>>    static int ufshcd_uic_hibern8_enter(struct ufs_hba *hba);
>>>    static inline void ufshcd_add_delay_before_dme_cmd(struct ufs_hba *hba);
>>> @@ -6819,11 +6818,6 @@ static int ufshcd_probe_hba(struct ufs_hba *hba)
>>>    	ufs_fixup_device_setup(hba, &card);
>>>    	ufshcd_tune_unipro_params(hba);
>>>    
>>> -	ret = ufshcd_set_vccq_rail_unused(hba,
>>> -		(hba->dev_quirks & UFS_DEVICE_NO_VCCQ) ? true : false);
>>> -	if (ret)
>>> -		goto out;
>>> -
>>>    	/* UFS device is also active now */
>>>    	ufshcd_set_ufs_dev_active(hba);
>>>    	ufshcd_force_reset_auto_bkops(hba);
>>> @@ -7007,24 +7001,13 @@ static int ufshcd_config_vreg_load(struct device *dev, struct ufs_vreg *vreg,
>>>    static inline int ufshcd_config_vreg_lpm(struct ufs_hba *hba,
>>>    					 struct ufs_vreg *vreg)
>>>    {
>>> -	if (!vreg)
>>> -		return 0;
>>> -	else if (vreg->unused)
>>> -		return 0;
>>> -	else
>>> -		return ufshcd_config_vreg_load(hba->dev, vreg,
>>> -					       UFS_VREG_LPM_LOAD_UA);
>>> +	return ufshcd_config_vreg_load(hba->dev, vreg, UFS_VREG_LPM_LOAD_UA);
>>>    }
>>>    
>>>    static inline int ufshcd_config_vreg_hpm(struct ufs_hba *hba,
>>>    					 struct ufs_vreg *vreg)
>>>    {
>>> -	if (!vreg)
>>> -		return 0;
>>> -	else if (vreg->unused)
>>> -		return 0;
>>> -	else
>>> -		return ufshcd_config_vreg_load(hba->dev, vreg, vreg->max_uA);
>>> +	return ufshcd_config_vreg_load(hba->dev, vreg, vreg->max_uA);
>>>    }
>>>    
>>>    static int ufshcd_config_vreg(struct device *dev,
>>> @@ -7062,9 +7045,7 @@ static int ufshcd_enable_vreg(struct device *dev, struct ufs_vreg *vreg)
>>>    {
>>>    	int ret = 0;
>>>    
>>> -	if (!vreg)
>>> -		goto out;
>>> -	else if (vreg->enabled || vreg->unused)
>>> +	if (!vreg || vreg->enabled)
>>>    		goto out;
>>>    
>>>    	ret = ufshcd_config_vreg(dev, vreg, true);
>>> @@ -7084,9 +7065,7 @@ static int ufshcd_disable_vreg(struct device *dev, struct ufs_vreg *vreg)
>>>    {
>>>    	int ret = 0;
>>>    
>>> -	if (!vreg)
>>> -		goto out;
>>> -	else if (!vreg->enabled || vreg->unused)
>>> +	if (!vreg || !vreg->enabled)
>>>    		goto out;
>>>    
>>>    	ret = regulator_disable(vreg->reg);
>>> @@ -7192,36 +7171,6 @@ static int ufshcd_init_hba_vreg(struct ufs_hba *hba)
>>>    	return 0;
>>>    }
>>>    
>>> -static int ufshcd_set_vccq_rail_unused(struct ufs_hba *hba, bool unused)
>>> -{
>>> -	int ret = 0;
>>> -	struct ufs_vreg_info *info = &hba->vreg_info;
>>> -
>>> -	if (!info)
>>> -		goto out;
>>> -	else if (!info->vccq)
>>> -		goto out;
>>> -
>>> -	if (unused) {
>>> -		/* shut off the rail here */
>>> -		ret = ufshcd_toggle_vreg(hba->dev, info->vccq, false);
>>> -		/*
>>> -		 * Mark this rail as no longer used, so it doesn't get enabled
>>> -		 * later by mistake
>>> -		 */
>>> -		if (!ret)
>>> -			info->vccq->unused = true;
>>> -	} else {
>>> -		/*
>>> -		 * rail should have been already enabled hence just make sure
>>> -		 * that unused flag is cleared.
>>> -		 */
>>> -		info->vccq->unused = false;
>>> -	}
>>> -out:
>>> -	return ret;
>>> -}
>>> -
>>>    static int __ufshcd_setup_clocks(struct ufs_hba *hba, bool on,
>>>    					bool skip_ref_clk)
>>>    {
>>>
> 
>