Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   "Winkler, Tomas" <tomas.winkler@intel.com>
To:     Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
CC:     "linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org" <linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org" 
        <linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>,
        "stable@vger.kernel.org" <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
        James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
        Jerry Snitselaar <jsnitsel@redhat.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3] tpm/tpm_crb: Avoid unaligned reads in crb_recv()
Thread-Topic: [PATCH v3] tpm/tpm_crb: Avoid unaligned reads in crb_recv()
Thread-Index: AQHUvUDUPtSrjGtlHk6wCuMRxetyu6XRCy8AgAAY64CAACU3gA==
Date:   Tue, 5 Feb 2019 14:56:02 +0000
Message-ID: <5B8DA87D05A7694D9FA63FD143655C1B9DA90C75@hasmsx108.ger.corp.intel.com>
References: <20190205105136.3086-1-jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
 <5B8DA87D05A7694D9FA63FD143655C1B9DA90A8B@hasmsx108.ger.corp.intel.com>
 <20190205143541.GA18330@linux.intel.com>
In-Reply-To: <20190205143541.GA18330@linux.intel.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
dlp-product: dlpe-windows
dlp-version: 11.0.400.15
dlp-reaction: no-action
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jarkko Sakkinen [mailto:jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2019 16:36
> To: Winkler, Tomas <tomas.winkler@intel.com>
> Cc: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-
> security-module@vger.kernel.org; stable@vger.kernel.org; James Morris
> <jmorris@namei.org>; Jerry Snitselaar <jsnitsel@redhat.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] tpm/tpm_crb: Avoid unaligned reads in crb_recv()
> 
> On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 11:07:16AM +0000, Winkler, Tomas wrote:
> > > The current approach to read first 6 bytes from the response and
> > > then tail of the response, can cause the 2nd memcpy_fromio() to do
> > > an unaligned read (e.g. read 32-bit word from address aligned to a
> > > 16-bits), depending on how
> > > memcpy_fromio() is implemented. If this happens, the read will fail
> > > and the memory controller will fill the read with 1's.
> > >
> > > This was triggered by 170d13ca3a2f, which should be probably refined
> > > to check and react to the address alignment. Before that commit, on
> > > x86
> > > memcpy_fromio() turned out to be memcpy(). By a luck GCC has done
> > > the right thing (from tpm_crb's perspective) for us so far, but we should not
> rely on that.
> > > Thus, it makes sense to fix this also in tpm_crb, not least because
> > > the fix can be then backported to stable kernels and make them more
> > > robust when compiled in differing environments.
> > >
> > > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> > > Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
> > > Cc: Tomas Winkler <tomas.winkler@intel.com>
> > > Cc: Jerry Snitselaar <jsnitsel@redhat.com>
> > > Fixes: 30fc8d138e91 ("tpm: TPM 2.0 CRB Interface")
> > > Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Jerry Snitselaar <jsnitsel@redhat.com>
> > > ---
> > > v3:
> > > * Fix typo i.e. %s/reminding/remaining/g
> >
> > Why you haven't fixed all the typos I've pointed out? I think you missed that.
> 
> I saw only comment about remaining. Was there something else? Can fix.

https://www.spinics.net/lists/stable/msg283648.html

1. unrecovable -> unrecoverable
2. /* Read 8 bytes (not just 6 bytes, which would cover the tag and the response  length
> +	 * fields) in order to make sure that the remaining memory accesses */ 
                                                                             
Thanks
Tomas