Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261502AbUCIEHm (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Mar 2004 23:07:42 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261503AbUCIEHm (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Mar 2004 23:07:42 -0500 Received: from mtaw6.prodigy.net ([64.164.98.56]:63620 "EHLO mtaw6.prodigy.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261502AbUCIEHl (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Mar 2004 23:07:41 -0500 Message-ID: <404D42DB.3060801@matchmail.com> Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2004 20:06:51 -0800 From: Mike Fedyk User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5 (X11/20040304) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rumi Szabolcs CC: Jeff Garzik , Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Marvell PATA-SATA bridge meets 2.4.x References: <20040305231642.708841dd.rumi_ml@rtfm.hu> <404A9D14.5030107@matchmail.com> <20040308172839.17178753.rumi_ml@rtfm.hu> <404CEEAF.5020608@matchmail.com> <20040309005338.376ae31d.rumi_ml@rtfm.hu> In-Reply-To: <20040309005338.376ae31d.rumi_ml@rtfm.hu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1433 Lines: 36 Rumi Szabolcs wrote: > On Mon, 08 Mar 2004 14:07:43 -0800 > Mike Fedyk wrote: > > >>>>You want to use a 2.6 kernel and talk to Bart, and Jeff about this... >>> >>>Well, I don't really want a 2.6 kernel on that machine (yet) because >>>in my opinion it is not stable enough for a production system. >> >>What problems are you having? > > > I'm just tracking lkml and seeing all the serious bug reports in 2.6 > each day. Maybe 2.6.3 is really rock stable compared to what 2.4.3 was > like but compared to VMS 6.2 it looks about as stable as a barrel of > nitroglycerine, so I thought I better wait for at least 2.6.10 > before even trying to put it on anything in production. > > By the way, I wrote "in my opinion" to avoid starting a flame war on > that "is 2.6 stable already or not?" thing, now it seems like I've > failed... ;-) > > So, until the reliability of 2.6 becomes acceptable for everyone I think > many people would appreciate fixes/backports for 2.4, especially for > those problems which don't take too much of an effort to fix. Ok, that's up to you. I'd still suggest you run it on one not so important machine so you get used to it. Mike - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/