Received: by 2002:ac0:8c9a:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id r26csp5478227ima; Tue, 5 Feb 2019 12:26:56 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AHgI3IaCVlp39gjla9XglXGEH7gzNBKJwV4r/WAPPJQTJD+sv4JT4sOxnkI3LiWxHJmrIfP2Ccez X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:2a0a:: with SMTP id i10mr6864510plb.323.1549398416449; Tue, 05 Feb 2019 12:26:56 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1549398416; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=WJq97WWl2fx5kyZeb/kyg8h7uetkvb3+L2QYKgusqpaqDftxoDvi0UuEBSzP8Wm65+ 1GzjvY19fcmaKw4NUr0m5iUTY7LReuxT3uA7Ju2HDECz/Wg1VgPv3Lkumjg1px7yCbUq cQCffMOn7IFu2CERftzXEPWITIcJtEY316gnnuhYRCDvmNt/UZ7k0uqjTizgCvjAgePB 3/xDO+I0B2ieMw7/7MhowZOwVDoB6iZwNvhB7W4i4CkI7qOO2i6/sKr/XZCABuBBJxQ7 QmkCV7aijxc4+W/quiUa7asqh067QKS0pNpKiwyzoXDmNdi05leAJQ9DD8wXYjJdm25b N7Lg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:message-id:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:from :references:cc:to:subject; bh=lQ4NF5Wz4AgRvrZux/FGkg/baKW9+QLaIjRZe5M2T6s=; b=H4AXMS13d6zOEAnTCLDBbwBDqzGQHOQQ3SEQ4lOr49LLqscm3okGUzjYFkkP2/zMqa FerWYF6T2Wf8NvGc86ty+XRxyJZ25sDdu/tIh4TqS9oy1uSo9gIOb1gDKzlxk6lpQE1x QqVyF+VyzKU0BM+ymziQYHgDd7l3fkd9QwQxFUgLf0kEXzMZgHKkoOISoiVprCq9/2/a EmTcVk29jgv9y/uzJrP7EoeaiM6MFCC/C6H3PIknomH2mdNuFuNkcHZgvqrJ7+s/emND 1FXVjI7+ovFP1fvghaqK4Z0NKyy7f0yCdrlMmZEMTXp3GW53ReADu24nOib2cwewRdyE zpaA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id d1si3904893pgg.301.2019.02.05.12.26.40; Tue, 05 Feb 2019 12:26:56 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728091AbfBEU0W (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 5 Feb 2019 15:26:22 -0500 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:59020 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726114AbfBEU0W (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Feb 2019 15:26:22 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098409.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x15KK1B1058129 for ; Tue, 5 Feb 2019 15:26:20 -0500 Received: from e35.co.us.ibm.com (e35.co.us.ibm.com [32.97.110.153]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2qfh54h5bc-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 05 Feb 2019 15:26:20 -0500 Received: from localhost by e35.co.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Tue, 5 Feb 2019 20:26:19 -0000 Received: from b03cxnp08026.gho.boulder.ibm.com (9.17.130.18) by e35.co.us.ibm.com (192.168.1.135) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Tue, 5 Feb 2019 20:26:17 -0000 Received: from b03ledav003.gho.boulder.ibm.com (b03ledav003.gho.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.130.234]) by b03cxnp08026.gho.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id x15KQC5w32964742 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 5 Feb 2019 20:26:12 GMT Received: from b03ledav003.gho.boulder.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF13E6A064; Tue, 5 Feb 2019 20:26:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b03ledav003.gho.boulder.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 879EA6A069; Tue, 5 Feb 2019 20:26:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [9.80.215.235] (unknown [9.80.215.235]) by b03ledav003.gho.boulder.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Tue, 5 Feb 2019 20:26:10 +0000 (GMT) Subject: Re: [PATCH] zcrypt: handle AP Info notification from CHSC SEI command To: Harald Freudenberger , Heiko Carstens Cc: Sebastian Ott , linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Martin Schwidefsky , oberpar@linux.ibm.com, pmorel@linux.ibm.com, pasic@linux.ibm.com, cohuck@redhat.com References: <1548870526-30595-1-git-send-email-akrowiak@linux.ibm.com> <88b72363-9dca-4653-c326-9c37b6349a32@linux.ibm.com> <20190201090159.GC3770@osiris> From: Tony Krowiak Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2019 15:26:09 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.2.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 19020520-0012-0000-0000-000017059B7E X-IBM-SpamModules-Scores: X-IBM-SpamModules-Versions: BY=3.00010543; HX=3.00000242; KW=3.00000007; PH=3.00000004; SC=3.00000279; SDB=6.01156796; UDB=6.00603458; IPR=6.00937320; MB=3.00025448; MTD=3.00000008; XFM=3.00000015; UTC=2019-02-05 20:26:18 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 19020520-0013-0000-0000-00005617E45D Message-Id: <70880c70-382b-2753-be46-4167a6e6b15f@linux.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2019-02-05_09:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1902050152 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2/4/19 5:06 AM, Harald Freudenberger wrote: > On 01.02.19 16:38, Tony Krowiak wrote: >> On 2/1/19 4:01 AM, Heiko Carstens wrote: >>> On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 06:28:39PM -0500, Tony Krowiak wrote: >>>> On 1/30/19 1:32 PM, Sebastian Ott wrote: >>>>> On Wed, 30 Jan 2019, Tony Krowiak wrote: >>>>>> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ZCRYPT) >>>>>> +void ap_bus_cfg_chg(void); >>>>>> +#else >>>>>> +#error "no CONFIG_ZCRYPT" >>>>>     ^ >>>>> I don't think that's the right thing to do here. >>>> >>>> I'd like to leave it. If somebody edits .config >>>> and sets CONFIG_ZCRYPT=n, then the build will >>>> fail. The preprocessor error above tells them >>>> why. >>> >>> No, the kernel build should never fail if a config option is not set. >>> Also the above should be "#ifdef CONFIG_ZCRYPT". >> >> Will do. >> >>> >>> In addition (this isn't quoted unfortunately) the alternative function >>> in the header file is missing the "inline" attribute. Can you please >>> add that too? >> >> I can. >> >>> >>> static inline void ap_bus_cfg_chg(void) { } >>> >>>>>> +* A config change has happened, Force an ap bus rescan. >>>>>> +*/ >>>>>> +void ap_bus_cfg_chg(void) >>>>>> +{ >>>>>> +    AP_DBF(DBF_INFO, "%s config change, forcing bus rescan\n", __func__); >>>>>> + >>>>>> +    ap_bus_force_rescan(); >>>>>> +} >>>>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(ap_bus_cfg_chg); >>>>> >>>>> There is no need for the export symbol - you don't call that function >>>> >from module code. >>>>> As an unrelated question, just to be sure: ap_bus.c is compiled as >>>>> built-in even with ZCRYPT=m, right? >>>> >>>> No. If you edit .config and set CONFIG_ZCRYPT=m, ap_bus.c will be built >>>> into the zcrypt.ko module. Through some other magic, the zcrypt module >>>> is loaded when linux boots. >>> >>> If that happens, then we have a build problem that needs to be >>> fixed. What exactly are you doing to get the ap code linked into the >>> zcrypt module? >> >> To tell you the truth, I don't know. The build configuration precedes my >> creating this patch by many years. I only discovered these anomalies by >> playing with the CONFIG_ZCRYPT option in response to Sebastian's >> comments. I will have to take this up with our internal IBM maintainer. >> >>> >> > As Martin already pointed out the ap bus code is statically build into the kernel > with this line in the Makefile: >   obj-$(subst m,y,$(CONFIG_ZCRYPT)) += ap.o > So CONFIG_ZCRYPT may have the value 'm' or 'y' > and this is also the reason why a simple #ifdef CONFIG_ZCRYPT does not > work, instead #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ZCRYPT) has to be used. > > Only the ap stuff (which is: ap_bus.o, ap_card.o and ap_queue.o) is statically > build into the kernel. The zcrypt kernel module is loaded as a dependency > when a crypto card is detected. So detecting a CEX4 forces kernel module > zcrypt_cex4.ko which forces the zcrypt.ko to insert into the kernel. > So all global functions in ap_bus.c are available when CONFIG_ZCRYPT is > enabled. However, I thought the symbol still needs an EXPORT_SYMBOL() > statement. Otherwise I should throw out all these statements. > > Harald Thank you for explaining that Harald. Tony K >