Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261845AbUCIJiy (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Mar 2004 04:38:54 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261851AbUCIJiy (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Mar 2004 04:38:54 -0500 Received: from kempelen.iit.bme.hu ([152.66.241.120]:1693 "EHLO kempelen.iit.bme.hu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261845AbUCIJiw (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Mar 2004 04:38:52 -0500 Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2004 10:38:45 +0100 (MET) Message-Id: <200403090938.i299cjv17207@kempelen.iit.bme.hu> From: Miklos Szeredi To: bernd.schubert@pci.uni-heidelberg.de, viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-reply-to: <200403081710.00850.bernd.schubert@pci.uni-heidelberg.de> (message from Bernd Schubert on Mon, 8 Mar 2004 17:10:00 +0100) Subject: Re: unionfs References: <200403080952.i289qsU12658@kempelen.iit.bme.hu> <200403081710.00850.bernd.schubert@pci.uni-heidelberg.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 697 Lines: 19 > I have never tested it, but from other reports I read that it works. > > http://translucency.sourceforge.net/ Thanks, but I'm not looking for a working unionfs, rather for design ideas for doing these sort of 'layered' filesystems _properly_, not with hacks like system call table modification (like the above solution). Al, can you please give some guidance? Have you any code for a unionfs design, or only ideas, or was this just myth? Miklos - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/