Received: by 2002:ac0:8c8e:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id r14csp631085ima; Wed, 6 Feb 2019 06:00:00 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AHgI3IbYKNhwLlPIbLq3ABEby1gJ4uK/dxpdS9XgWjcD+KFT0F1lRajwv0kvFXe3V9YvOsezrTFy X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:7c93:: with SMTP id y19mr10679745pll.41.1549461600447; Wed, 06 Feb 2019 06:00:00 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1549461600; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Wm01WjjPLFOl6dyMNVuS6JCtY80Sy/ppOFiPTUG5J+IICDK8WevPEp91QYzE31B2Y2 0xXicXG7PQwGJR/Eu5po5weYKDK8/wJL+fyHxtktwpIk+7R5P9usivrD4ueepc6e7zVh rWuDw2ZClPa2Dj5Nd846WxLphgQI7CSOP0fv6BTxu1fEGZRtd1rmcOOh77kE80lWJv+I BwxKhtrgZNe2t+YCT4jegtLEL9XlFQOZhpnbzSV+7QQarocSv0FwJtisLcTGLJyyhBHT JzePzTh7tGKstGQULFgSjIkLg2PoNaIJT6raebqAfuNaQhSMEYeVdkPJNPS1q8bUYLnG 8m9A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=s5Vyn0XKshbSgw8NtnIBd90smariThpf/AjP/V7Bfzc=; b=B3FHJMfojkXR2feLf0w/03fKEUjeV7WrL56aFXa4IiuYbtwBHqMyl4DANcOorWKjr0 ThQ+3CGiCsOXLCVOusVAsLeK3wM5msgincYvdY6Cdy8yU/0WsPZIQ8urBzjCTe3vBy8T jFjY124AwcIVCV4YLPjXJE6JmKC7pHZFd0KMorbLYMJ1tHbu2/C62OS7btIEsdf8JTpI 061GTUvmdz8mex6R67SbaR+t+TYe6iz/8rPdYfAdZbRCZrjW4MoYHf3d9WABqkS0FvE+ YWyJHLLLk+J1p1G7C3/QVDpRS+Tg5+2+HjlkUQXkcssCuSEX71I0Bl7xzNgDAAmePIN4 ru6w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id b9si5533420pgt.293.2019.02.06.05.59.44; Wed, 06 Feb 2019 06:00:00 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729272AbfBFN7U (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 6 Feb 2019 08:59:20 -0500 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:53398 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727262AbfBFN7U (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Feb 2019 08:59:20 -0500 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.72.51.249]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F36A980D; Wed, 6 Feb 2019 05:59:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from e107155-lin (e107155-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.196.42]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 56FAA3F557; Wed, 6 Feb 2019 05:59:18 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2019 13:59:09 +0000 From: Sudeep Holla To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jisheng Zhang , Steve Longerbeam , Eugeniu Rosca , Joshua Frkuska , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Sudeep Holla Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] drivers core: cpu: add hotplug callback to update cpu_dev state to resumed Message-ID: <20190206135909.GA24335@e107155-lin> References: <20190125130701.GA855@vmlxhi-102.adit-jv.com> <20190131160559.GA32759@e107155-lin> <20190204153720.GA24131@e107155-lin> <2477683.mi0XWuPk1d@aspire.rjw.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2477683.mi0XWuPk1d@aspire.rjw.lan> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Feb 06, 2019 at 11:31:04AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Monday, February 4, 2019 4:37:20 PM CET Sudeep Holla wrote: > > > > Sorry for the nag, since the title has RFC, thought there are chances of > > this getting lost. Let me know if the below idea aligns with your suggestion ? > > RFC would be fine, but Patchwork doesn't pick up patches posted as replies > in the middle of a thread. :-) > I completely understand and I had intentions to post it as a patch so that patchwork sees it. Just wanted to check if I align well with what you suggested. > Yes, this is basically what I suggested, please post. > Thanks for confirming. I will post the patch shortly. -- Regards, Sudeep