Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>
To:     Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com>,
        Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Jian Hu <jian.hu@amlogic.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/4] clk: meson-g12a: Add EE clock controller driver
In-Reply-To: <5C55CDCE.9030502@baylibre.com>
References: <20190201145345.6795-1-jbrunet@baylibre.com> <5C55CDCE.9030502@baylibre.com>
Date:   Wed, 06 Feb 2019 19:58:04 -0800
Message-ID: <7hbm3ogshf.fsf@baylibre.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com> writes:

> Le 01/02/2019 15:53, Jerome Brunet a =C3=A9crit :
>> This purpose of this patchset is to the main clock controller of the
>> g12a SoC family
>>=20
>> This patchset depends on the recent rework the meson clock directory [7].

[...]

> Reviewed-by: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com>
>
> I'm applying these to next/drivers for Linux 5.1-rc1, is it necessary to
> have a tag for the headers ?

Only if we have some users that we want to merge in the v5.1 cycle
(which I haven't seen yet.)

Kevin