Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262191AbUCIU7Z (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Mar 2004 15:59:25 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262193AbUCIU7Y (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Mar 2004 15:59:24 -0500 Received: from FW-30-241.go.retevision.es ([62.174.241.30]:22349 "EHLO nebula.ghetto") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262191AbUCIU6X (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Mar 2004 15:58:23 -0500 Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2004 21:57:20 +0100 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Ludootje Subject: Re: performance better in 2.6.1 than in 2.6.3 Message-ID: <20040309205720.GA10182@larroy.com> Reply-To: piotr@larroy.com Mail-Followup-To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ludootje References: <1078867762.4908.20.camel@gax.mynet> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1078867762.4908.20.camel@gax.mynet> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i From: piotr@larroy.com (Pedro Larroy) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1915 Lines: 50 On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 09:29:22PM +0000, Ludootje wrote: > Hi, > > I'm currently using Linux 2.6.1 (vanilla, no patches applied). I've never used > 2.6.2, but I did compile 2.6.3 (vanilla too) a few weeks ago, and I used that > for a while. > > When I use KDE and start some 'heavy' applications with 2.6.3, I have > performance problems. Example: amaroK is playing music in KDE, I start > up Firebird or Evolution, and the music 'skips' a bit. It doesn't stop playing, > it just skips some bits. When the app is loaded, all is fine again. > I don't have this behaviour in 2.6.1, so I'm using that again ATM. > > I used the same configuration each time (attached is my /proc/config.gz). > I'm using an AMD Athlon XP 2400+. > > I don't know how I can 'show' the problem, as I don't think the load average > is useful for this problem, so I'm not including it. I really have no idea what > can be useful, so please tell me what stuff I should add (if any). > > I'm sorry if this a known problem, but I don't remember seeing something like > this on the list. > > Thanks, > Ludootje Maybe you want to try a little IO latency measurement program to see if the skips are beeing caused by disk/ioscheduling delays, it's in: http://pedro.larroy.com/devel/iolat/ Here: http://pedro.larroy.com/devel/iolat/analisys/ are some measures from an ide disk in a AMD-768 chipset and a scsi cheetah 10K on an AIC-7892A U160/m. I'm still working to find why those delays in the ide disk. Regards. -- Pedro Larroy Tovar | Linux & Network consultant | piotr%member.fsf.org Software patents are a threat to innovation in Europe please check: http://www.eurolinux.org/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/