Received: by 2002:ac0:946b:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j40csp853692imj; Thu, 7 Feb 2019 12:58:32 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AHgI3Ia4Vur9Q26aDGGs/lVn4oYn/mLjvhms6tMfuzRnkn33HFw4BIg5QwhvaSf5wZJd4I/yW8DP X-Received: by 2002:a63:534c:: with SMTP id t12mr921546pgl.205.1549573112006; Thu, 07 Feb 2019 12:58:32 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1549573111; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=NvlbSVg0Zh0hCR+ge9yco7NyrTRfboCZLyyDGOcZpG4aPNDvdBYsQcj9G3/AJu0z6c l8JAiFTu8akwPvsSy3irXrjf6N04HTwYB4WSi2RY3Z4rASSOclup63ZJSI1bYlLSRPjE nunGb57HBjdc6wX7EH3Ti3Kbq6YXYvXs/b53s9KsgsywJnY/0WIh0jr7nI93SvCPADbQ wdgC8fWi4t58rgcJwz6ZnMDvsdE75boffQgTX3Pd24MLuCHvJ8x+z4RgyjKr0nVcYVZk 0qut2enen1aLKqTB6PhIlJVhCiJufdNlfbB+9ratiUHfM5RhI0/6J9wRvEZToFKRaJIp jXMA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from :dkim-signature; bh=bBOrwufm4FHfjMXGrxdvnQvXb/cSnW3qN7gry5U8GvU=; b=S7Z5ZAYXjdjOXTZNNsru2cXeDPF9fCncUuTCYzMmcCFscC6Xrvj3pFZVnUBtxHem97 bP97Ju4ST0TrDtqsxMFxFmg8c1BR5DqOipFw8Jg/lVO3Tu1GNCEY2qGIbpIPHc0wc2HN KlOgZyCuNDTtqeP/ynpHEsWbgKsdoliAY358ZC8j0ZLYZZMz4dZrHaGObw9v8/qfQuD9 cl8cazvQyt+lc8lgtFCqi9ftvk/SGkou6DfD9ekCChh9InTUSO/RPc1kkGZSZndmpQIO ClkorIVX/Wi4M9mDRWfWfgWybiorXAcUklWQo/3CEjck5B0M8zcoObqwC8uc5Sw8YUkZ Uihw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@chromium.org header.s=google header.b=f9X6RRnW; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=chromium.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id j10si4274plk.238.2019.02.07.12.58.16; Thu, 07 Feb 2019 12:58:31 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@chromium.org header.s=google header.b=f9X6RRnW; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=chromium.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727617AbfBGU5z (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 7 Feb 2019 15:57:55 -0500 Received: from mail-pg1-f193.google.com ([209.85.215.193]:41564 "EHLO mail-pg1-f193.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726691AbfBGU5y (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Feb 2019 15:57:54 -0500 Received: by mail-pg1-f193.google.com with SMTP id m1so491219pgq.8 for ; Thu, 07 Feb 2019 12:57:53 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=bBOrwufm4FHfjMXGrxdvnQvXb/cSnW3qN7gry5U8GvU=; b=f9X6RRnWU4eA2avJU355gF6GI/Ea4SwxPSjHHUW0EWVE9U00Fg5ZwQb343olHBNioU E4AOEDxLqvk2ljWLK1uZ5F4lYEDJ9h8+0hPgKjk1RAi0wnQIQZblxnOLgcDl/zzfLP2g UBwdc7+e73/Cg7rvbtR01KndlMpZbQFQcBN6M= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=bBOrwufm4FHfjMXGrxdvnQvXb/cSnW3qN7gry5U8GvU=; b=Eo+D4hkPhKcPUq1dll47jcpWudDtmCze1YDjpiVe0puw4DRlVhBiRFMp0023eIlOor 3TSbxQYMn+fu6zZZC1DStRpiSfLrBB2kvc1oF2IWf37kogvIhnKt2tnJfPLdcZf6DpYJ Rp0dQrEqv1nRSCFmDcgGdMpscbYA3TglYVUp6TZBWP+D6ZAKT7uRB2F6vL2y1tXXx9Ic 0VkP0xmnW60lOgvYnsVr0CPKCBzFkWM7gE9X1k3FTgXWAGOk6S5ZAqr4BunRuTPwyIrL mfQZi0rqwx83K5o8O1a/IAsuyZDiJLATWZsEfbrHr8jObGcPN9JpEy0By9mGt+r91S/J mXhw== X-Gm-Message-State: AHQUAub7YtHP0jqK7K8iVyghbnuBrdaobPQ7uANftqYlIfdMhDo/gTWJ /CAU1SjWNZLKZmSLJKDCfESHfw== X-Received: by 2002:a62:33c1:: with SMTP id z184mr18085394pfz.104.1549573073203; Thu, 07 Feb 2019 12:57:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from evgreen2.mtv.corp.google.com ([2620:15c:202:201:ffda:7716:9afc:1301]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y9sm27199pfi.74.2019.02.07.12.57.52 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 07 Feb 2019 12:57:52 -0800 (PST) From: Evan Green To: Jens Axboe Cc: Bart Van Assche , Gwendal Grignou , Martin K Petersen , Alexis Savery , Ming Lei , Evan Green , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] loop: Better discard support for block devices Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2019 12:57:29 -0800 Message-Id: <20190207205730.199332-3-evgreen@chromium.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.20.1 In-Reply-To: <20190207205730.199332-1-evgreen@chromium.org> References: <20190207205730.199332-1-evgreen@chromium.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org If the backing device for a loop device is a block device, then mirror the discard properties of the underlying block device into the loop device. While in there, differentiate between REQ_OP_DISCARD and REQ_OP_WRITE_ZEROES, which are different for block devices, but which the loop device had just been lumping together. This change fixes blktest block/003, and removes an extraneous error print in block/013 when testing on a loop device backed by a block device that does not support discard. Signed-off-by: Evan Green --- Changes in v2: None drivers/block/loop.c | 61 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------- 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/block/loop.c b/drivers/block/loop.c index b6c2d8f3202b..9b1fb2d639f1 100644 --- a/drivers/block/loop.c +++ b/drivers/block/loop.c @@ -417,19 +417,14 @@ static int lo_read_transfer(struct loop_device *lo, struct request *rq, return ret; } -static int lo_discard(struct loop_device *lo, struct request *rq, loff_t pos) +static int lo_discard(struct loop_device *lo, struct request *rq, + int mode, loff_t pos) { - /* - * We use punch hole to reclaim the free space used by the - * image a.k.a. discard. However we do not support discard if - * encryption is enabled, because it may give an attacker - * useful information. - */ struct file *file = lo->lo_backing_file; - int mode = FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE | FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE; + struct request_queue *q = lo->lo_queue; int ret; - if ((!file->f_op->fallocate) || lo->lo_encrypt_key_size) { + if (!blk_queue_discard(q)) { ret = -EOPNOTSUPP; goto out; } @@ -599,8 +594,13 @@ static int do_req_filebacked(struct loop_device *lo, struct request *rq) case REQ_OP_FLUSH: return lo_req_flush(lo, rq); case REQ_OP_DISCARD: + return lo_discard(lo, rq, + FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE | FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE, pos); + case REQ_OP_WRITE_ZEROES: - return lo_discard(lo, rq, pos); + return lo_discard(lo, rq, + FALLOC_FL_ZERO_RANGE | FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE, pos); + case REQ_OP_WRITE: if (lo->transfer) return lo_write_transfer(lo, rq, pos); @@ -854,6 +854,25 @@ static void loop_config_discard(struct loop_device *lo) struct file *file = lo->lo_backing_file; struct inode *inode = file->f_mapping->host; struct request_queue *q = lo->lo_queue; + struct request_queue *backingq; + + /* + * If the backing device is a block device, mirror its discard + * capabilities. + */ + if (S_ISBLK(inode->i_mode)) { + backingq = bdev_get_queue(inode->i_bdev); + blk_queue_max_discard_sectors(q, + backingq->limits.max_discard_sectors); + + blk_queue_max_write_zeroes_sectors(q, + backingq->limits.max_write_zeroes_sectors); + + q->limits.discard_granularity = + backingq->limits.discard_granularity; + + q->limits.discard_alignment = + backingq->limits.discard_alignment; /* * We use punch hole to reclaim the free space used by the @@ -861,22 +880,24 @@ static void loop_config_discard(struct loop_device *lo) * encryption is enabled, because it may give an attacker * useful information. */ - if ((!file->f_op->fallocate) || - lo->lo_encrypt_key_size) { + } else if ((!file->f_op->fallocate) || lo->lo_encrypt_key_size) { q->limits.discard_granularity = 0; q->limits.discard_alignment = 0; blk_queue_max_discard_sectors(q, 0); blk_queue_max_write_zeroes_sectors(q, 0); - blk_queue_flag_clear(QUEUE_FLAG_DISCARD, q); - return; - } - q->limits.discard_granularity = inode->i_sb->s_blocksize; - q->limits.discard_alignment = 0; + } else { + q->limits.discard_granularity = inode->i_sb->s_blocksize; + q->limits.discard_alignment = 0; + + blk_queue_max_discard_sectors(q, UINT_MAX >> 9); + blk_queue_max_write_zeroes_sectors(q, UINT_MAX >> 9); + } - blk_queue_max_discard_sectors(q, UINT_MAX >> 9); - blk_queue_max_write_zeroes_sectors(q, UINT_MAX >> 9); - blk_queue_flag_set(QUEUE_FLAG_DISCARD, q); + if (q->limits.max_discard_sectors || q->limits.max_write_zeroes_sectors) + blk_queue_flag_set(QUEUE_FLAG_DISCARD, q); + else + blk_queue_flag_clear(QUEUE_FLAG_DISCARD, q); } static void loop_unprepare_queue(struct loop_device *lo) -- 2.20.1