Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262327AbUCJAyy (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Mar 2004 19:54:54 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262542AbUCJAyx (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Mar 2004 19:54:53 -0500 Received: from host199.200-117-131.telecom.net.ar ([200.117.131.199]:50698 "EHLO smtp.bensa.ar") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262327AbUCJAyx (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Mar 2004 19:54:53 -0500 From: Norberto Bensa To: Norihiko Mukouyama Subject: Re: Kernel 2.6.3 patch for Intel Compiler 8.0 Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2004 21:56:57 -0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 Cc: Ingo at Pyrillion , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200403092156.57423.norberto+linux-kernel@bensa.ath.cx> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 575 Lines: 17 Norihiko Mukouyama wrote: > Hi All!! > > >Results: 33% of the lmbench procs faster on icc, 66% faster on gcc. > If it is ture using icc 66% faster than gcc., It is wonderful. > Could you show us detail data to lmbench results. I saw it the other way around: gcc is faster 66% of the time. Or did I read wrong? Thanks, Norberto - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/