Received: by 2002:ac0:946b:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j40csp1374672imj; Thu, 7 Feb 2019 23:57:42 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AHgI3IZ2bTeJGWerdiZ8RJGhu40bFpBNHpQ6p8O/vOSrKj6g/tlXdL3Mr5CXmBQ+EFDifkLISYKg X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:8641:: with SMTP id y1mr21251784plt.159.1549612662704; Thu, 07 Feb 2019 23:57:42 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1549612662; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Dpt6r38jT6l5zRwrhtUTdvselpVOe838apyJ48u3FHN/wkg0fPY7UHlax2bw43xgP8 z6679aBVFNdSt6YcpjZP1iKA/M9dMkPmOXpe8muvKBZ/AnN0eL7ATi6rgN/HiJ2tVuUM xlZ9aGZXugL4mxJhQpIUSa5I9sV5EycgR1oeRmSIvbeurlJG9FBaBBi6cr5f/PcvtoZ/ iU5vgMfOvJo0vMbNXxQY10/9fhV++EcYjOluB/zkfYoCeyXjGW/qMYCiNcQCHaKfPm/F WDxGG6LPN791DBH0D9OdL+blWzML7G3BO+fE6ilWAdI71s4M6p89sb/kt+jCt/sOUQJN 97mg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:dkim-signature; bh=pT1WR/BNCsrn3s1zGOcHcZxDWiKW2nJcicbtRI33DmE=; b=h+6qWlm419lI9P7cDOmobbbm0WGDYslwl4EwdXJ2FyBQiQKCR9efEml1SFXU7wfsu0 ri44of8IDCbNQ4wvRFe4xMhNz3Y8b+YiJmVCwC7ogznAhUBnP8PBEVvrnfYQlRdEL33g PpqWU4JLSm0Hj3XKaU8pUCdaqfot5AhciSowaK7kleTcutxRuUt/5QOOqRzUpILDsWZ7 KNP40RKnIwFtd/iKE7Yr9gFQfCs1tAFC4RUMODDcvAjKfuqPc/09aIBXzdNKLDm3YCnL xZJmZmYQNC1gAZ3RWpyceTlvyM/hwuHuE3FJgKLAuXV43XXMsuNZ9d8j/iSBzQKDmjtB HPEw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b="T/wV6iRQ"; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id t13si1341164pgv.464.2019.02.07.23.57.27; Thu, 07 Feb 2019 23:57:42 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b="T/wV6iRQ"; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727237AbfBHH4y (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 8 Feb 2019 02:56:54 -0500 Received: from mail-pg1-f196.google.com ([209.85.215.196]:38691 "EHLO mail-pg1-f196.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726004AbfBHH4y (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Feb 2019 02:56:54 -0500 Received: by mail-pg1-f196.google.com with SMTP id g189so1235062pgc.5; Thu, 07 Feb 2019 23:56:53 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=pT1WR/BNCsrn3s1zGOcHcZxDWiKW2nJcicbtRI33DmE=; b=T/wV6iRQr7x7NIcIDG0RCKUaxAf2cgP0IrBpw4EJvYfPGjQ/z4v70BwgC6cZqt2Vsm PTMZ3iNCtuqPOv97h0qSrBTe6dPczibIOtGH3aH9J+LFt0796K+5BY3MIwxqiClXUrtG zfEZ8UpZoj0GK53dVXEPVSCj3t80zjVu96b78fkI5/5zMzcg+g0f96nSe8F4Qr7v9m0c PfYcLgUT7HU2NsCbdySHhXlNgpONEbnKWD1M6Vx+WcEJDSePG/ra/5ZIqfeRgYJ+gF/d 5WpZwicQgyAhIzy+hBSKR2UozlhLwkumeLjYKCu9ghA9xUcB7rM9vfP74a8tR8iRbKeK K7xQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=pT1WR/BNCsrn3s1zGOcHcZxDWiKW2nJcicbtRI33DmE=; b=BoLIPOhUy/49NORhEs8Vj8/29QyNSYlHzkmvPyXTgmVK0RB374j8JRg8qdcm1gPMdT 7WbRL0jl0RrQWE2hCYwBviCN1jH1TdlXj5Oc/6nQ7E2EcWR/jo19Sr63ZL9108hAljfK SwTJ2Xq9+VrCTpEO6df9cY3W/BhSLmFWECo0NpyynNdYh274bA06MQyL/KbAHLXCFtaM y0gVuoMhwS76j50StWBwTXCcvSV8okxLA1IDy3cwMlMs1bxJhyrzSW3J/an6Kcu2X1Tl HelgJUancESL6YLmrpA+79l4cdLmihM7B5VMvgv/mpIRiuMN+oKGl1LOqVVQRiugPnQ1 ofGg== X-Gm-Message-State: AHQUAuatms+xTITtYPLfmWZ0kDjdmC7C62DYJTNIwXitNOTVis4U3Cew 13nqD/rBv6d+NSVuXy38iGs= X-Received: by 2002:a63:ce0e:: with SMTP id y14mr19350314pgf.145.1549612612922; Thu, 07 Feb 2019 23:56:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from blueforge.nvidia.com (searspoint.nvidia.com. [216.228.112.21]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h64sm2642610pfc.142.2019.02.07.23.56.50 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 07 Feb 2019 23:56:52 -0800 (PST) From: john.hubbard@gmail.com X-Google-Original-From: jhubbard@nvidia.com To: Andrew Morton , linux-mm@kvack.org Cc: Al Viro , Christian Benvenuti , Christoph Hellwig , Christopher Lameter , Dan Williams , Dave Chinner , Dennis Dalessandro , Doug Ledford , Jan Kara , Jason Gunthorpe , Jerome Glisse , Matthew Wilcox , Michal Hocko , Mike Rapoport , Mike Marciniszyn , Ralph Campbell , Tom Talpey , LKML , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, John Hubbard Subject: [PATCH 0/2] mm: put_user_page() call site conversion first Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2019 23:56:47 -0800 Message-Id: <20190208075649.3025-1-jhubbard@nvidia.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.20.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-NVConfidentiality: public Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: John Hubbard Hi, It seems about time to post these initial patches: I think we have pretty good consensus on the concept and details of the put_user_pages() approach. Therefore, here are the first two patches, to get started on converting the get_user_pages() call sites to use put_user_page(), instead of put_page(). This is in order to implement tracking of get_user_page() pages. A discussion of the overall problem is below. As mentioned in patch 0001, the steps are to fix the problem are: 1) Provide put_user_page*() routines, intended to be used for releasing pages that were pinned via get_user_pages*(). 2) Convert all of the call sites for get_user_pages*(), to invoke put_user_page*(), instead of put_page(). This involves dozens of call sites, and will take some time. 3) After (2) is complete, use get_user_pages*() and put_user_page*() to implement tracking of these pages. This tracking will be separate from the existing struct page refcounting. 4) Use the tracking and identification of these pages, to implement special handling (especially in writeback paths) when the pages are backed by a filesystem. This write up is lifted from the RFC v2 patchset cover letter [1]: Overview ======== Some kernel components (file systems, device drivers) need to access memory that is specified via process virtual address. For a long time, the API to achieve that was get_user_pages ("GUP") and its variations. However, GUP has critical limitations that have been overlooked; in particular, GUP does not interact correctly with filesystems in all situations. That means that file-backed memory + GUP is a recipe for potential problems, some of which have already occurred in the field. GUP was first introduced for Direct IO (O_DIRECT), allowing filesystem code to get the struct page behind a virtual address and to let storage hardware perform a direct copy to or from that page. This is a short-lived access pattern, and as such, the window for a concurrent writeback of GUP'd page was small enough that there were not (we think) any reported problems. Also, userspace was expected to understand and accept that Direct IO was not synchronized with memory-mapped access to that data, nor with any process address space changes such as munmap(), mremap(), etc. Over the years, more GUP uses have appeared (virtualization, device drivers, RDMA) that can keep the pages they get via GUP for a long period of time (seconds, minutes, hours, days, ...). This long-term pinning makes an underlying design problem more obvious. In fact, there are a number of key problems inherent to GUP: Interactions with file systems ============================== File systems expect to be able to write back data, both to reclaim pages, and for data integrity. Allowing other hardware (NICs, GPUs, etc) to gain write access to the file memory pages means that such hardware can dirty the pages, without the filesystem being aware. This can, in some cases (depending on filesystem, filesystem options, block device, block device options, and other variables), lead to data corruption, and also to kernel bugs of the form: kernel BUG at /build/linux-fQ94TU/linux-4.4.0/fs/ext4/inode.c:1899! backtrace: ext4_writepage __writepage write_cache_pages ext4_writepages do_writepages __writeback_single_inode writeback_sb_inodes __writeback_inodes_wb wb_writeback wb_workfn process_one_work worker_thread kthread ret_from_fork ...which is due to the file system asserting that there are still buffer heads attached: ({ \ BUG_ON(!PagePrivate(page)); \ ((struct buffer_head *)page_private(page)); \ }) Dave Chinner's description of this is very clear: "The fundamental issue is that ->page_mkwrite must be called on every write access to a clean file backed page, not just the first one. How long the GUP reference lasts is irrelevant, if the page is clean and you need to dirty it, you must call ->page_mkwrite before it is marked writeable and dirtied. Every. Time." This is just one symptom of the larger design problem: filesystems do not actually support get_user_pages() being called on their pages, and letting hardware write directly to those pages--even though that pattern has been going on since about 2005 or so. Long term GUP ============= Long term GUP is an issue when FOLL_WRITE is specified to GUP (so, a writeable mapping is created), and the pages are file-backed. That can lead to filesystem corruption. What happens is that when a file-backed page is being written back, it is first mapped read-only in all of the CPU page tables; the file system then assumes that nobody can write to the page, and that the page content is therefore stable. Unfortunately, the GUP callers generally do not monitor changes to the CPU pages tables; they instead assume that the following pattern is safe (it's not): get_user_pages() Hardware can keep a reference to those pages for a very long time, and write to it at any time. Because "hardware" here means "devices that are not a CPU", this activity occurs without any interaction with the kernel's file system code. for each page set_page_dirty put_page() In fact, the GUP documentation even recommends that pattern. Anyway, the file system assumes that the page is stable (nothing is writing to the page), and that is a problem: stable page content is necessary for many filesystem actions during writeback, such as checksum, encryption, RAID striping, etc. Furthermore, filesystem features like COW (copy on write) or snapshot also rely on being able to use a new page for as memory for that memory range inside the file. Corruption during write back is clearly possible here. To solve that, one idea is to identify pages that have active GUP, so that we can use a bounce page to write stable data to the filesystem. The filesystem would work on the bounce page, while any of the active GUP might write to the original page. This would avoid the stable page violation problem, but note that it is only part of the overall solution, because other problems remain. Other filesystem features that need to replace the page with a new one can be inhibited for pages that are GUP-pinned. This will, however, alter and limit some of those filesystem features. The only fix for that would be to require GUP users to monitor and respond to CPU page table updates. Subsystems such as ODP and HMM do this, for example. This aspect of the problem is still under discussion. Direct IO ========= Direct IO can cause corruption, if userspace does Direct-IO that writes to a range of virtual addresses that are mmap'd to a file. The pages written to are file-backed pages that can be under write back, while the Direct IO is taking place. Here, Direct IO races with a write back: it calls GUP before page_mkclean() has replaced the CPU pte with a read-only entry. The race window is pretty small, which is probably why years have gone by before we noticed this problem: Direct IO is generally very quick, and tends to finish up before the filesystem gets around to do anything with the page contents. However, it's still a real problem. The solution is to never let GUP return pages that are under write back, but instead, force GUP to take a write fault on those pages. That way, GUP will properly synchronize with the active write back. This does not change the required GUP behavior, it just avoids that race. [1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190204052135.25784-1-jhubbard@nvidia.com Cc: Christian Benvenuti Cc: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Christopher Lameter Cc: Dan Williams Cc: Dave Chinner Cc: Dennis Dalessandro Cc: Doug Ledford Cc: Jan Kara Cc: Jason Gunthorpe Cc: Jérôme Glisse Cc: Matthew Wilcox Cc: Michal Hocko Cc: Mike Rapoport Cc: Mike Marciniszyn Cc: Ralph Campbell Cc: Tom Talpey John Hubbard (2): mm: introduce put_user_page*(), placeholder versions infiniband/mm: convert put_page() to put_user_page*() drivers/infiniband/core/umem.c | 7 +- drivers/infiniband/core/umem_odp.c | 2 +- drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/user_pages.c | 11 +-- drivers/infiniband/hw/mthca/mthca_memfree.c | 6 +- drivers/infiniband/hw/qib/qib_user_pages.c | 11 +-- drivers/infiniband/hw/qib/qib_user_sdma.c | 6 +- drivers/infiniband/hw/usnic/usnic_uiom.c | 7 +- include/linux/mm.h | 24 ++++++ mm/swap.c | 82 +++++++++++++++++++++ 9 files changed, 129 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-) -- 2.20.1