Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261524AbUCJBxJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Mar 2004 20:53:09 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261920AbUCJBxI (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Mar 2004 20:53:08 -0500 Received: from 1-2-2-1a.has.sth.bostream.se ([82.182.130.86]:42450 "EHLO K-7.stesmi.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261524AbUCJBxG (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Mar 2004 20:53:06 -0500 Message-ID: <404E74EF.1010204@stesmi.com> Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 02:52:47 +0100 From: Stefan Smietanowski User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7a) Gecko/20040219 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Norberto Bensa CC: Norihiko Mukouyama , Ingo at Pyrillion , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Kernel 2.6.3 patch for Intel Compiler 8.0 References: <200403092156.57423.norberto+linux-kernel@bensa.ath.cx> In-Reply-To: <200403092156.57423.norberto+linux-kernel@bensa.ath.cx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 722 Lines: 25 Norberto Bensa wrote: > Norihiko Mukouyama wrote: > >>Hi All!! >> >> >>>Results: 33% of the lmbench procs faster on icc, 66% faster on gcc. >> >>If it is ture using icc 66% faster than gcc., It is wonderful. >>Could you show us detail data to lmbench results. > > > I saw it the other way around: gcc is faster 66% of the time. Or did I read > wrong? 1/3 of the things are faster with icc. 2/3 of the things are faster with gcc. Performance numbers not given. // Stefan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/