Received: by 2002:ac0:946b:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j40csp1482083imj; Fri, 8 Feb 2019 02:09:03 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AHgI3IZz3Hg5A7NKW/wHjRltMGN+0hKVX7Qz5sIcgXrdfeHQ0T8yxhM4CjNSLP/wzjGaxtPhyyH7 X-Received: by 2002:aa7:87c3:: with SMTP id i3mr9102049pfo.245.1549620543626; Fri, 08 Feb 2019 02:09:03 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1549620543; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=mHLE/mAQoDYReAl9/L5gpnyugX6AwPKaz4nHWvi+9FzlL2IfKs3ORdGgXHFnhtC0jC 1vZPsJFS4Yg6mmAl8fGBGUTMe/c6zYpwVoHXcIPSaykdxwCum3n32vVXMRAxI0iuln04 MV7/M8nkyzcFiEbe2yd7URSZ49Qxb/X6MKn1QBEM5b12K/gUIUba6sK9+490Hu+wrPMn I8C659+/pD02qP+kIkRH3yhVgT8IJo20BdcjfBMUpQV8GpCY4FomRlVON2VFmymL8gcq 8zOIybsj5f6C0zP1Xu1wRkJUN+bjlrDlKwstUDY5er7jNc278dexhYrhSz5BHhv5M4Fo zA4g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from; bh=kGIzau156i4pIAeVjEKETO+QjswV0c61EyN8xSe9KQM=; b=Nolk+0OEkmGifCTrfg5CsY2uw4uz7knDJllGcAeTU7t7JsG9Wt0oraRPzPgBGw08JZ Q+wlfcrINPghebWRFMxBiVmxHSF4rMUoA8uqNKFPLFbkyUZtiUJWSFSzHcaAtOzO5KnY Fjm8yVp6q0Ko9f91e12sAbCBnHFerwZd0a8hLoQ74pF4YxaXo/oa8w0I22jivJttBj6U VApqpQqvITUpq2dn673VvB5x9tIPgawtpZP3El+aq+u8aHSO4NtqgpQeoU24NSnsaVBE yrSBEb9d9fKapCJOlFgtV7vkxAVSToym2feRGCsj2R70CiP82MeE8uRBml1K5BDTx4kR RtDQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id p12si1633961pgl.106.2019.02.08.02.08.48; Fri, 08 Feb 2019 02:09:03 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727860AbfBHKHC (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 8 Feb 2019 05:07:02 -0500 Received: from usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:47694 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727841AbfBHKHB (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Feb 2019 05:07:01 -0500 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.72.51.249]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2891FA78; Fri, 8 Feb 2019 02:07:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from e110439-lin.cambridge.arm.com (e110439-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.194.43]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 11B263F557; Fri, 8 Feb 2019 02:06:56 -0800 (PST) From: Patrick Bellasi To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org Cc: Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Tejun Heo , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Vincent Guittot , Viresh Kumar , Paul Turner , Quentin Perret , Dietmar Eggemann , Morten Rasmussen , Juri Lelli , Todd Kjos , Joel Fernandes , Steve Muckle , Suren Baghdasaryan Subject: [PATCH v7 14/15] sched/core: uclamp: Use TG's clamps to restrict TASK's clamps Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2019 10:05:53 +0000 Message-Id: <20190208100554.32196-15-patrick.bellasi@arm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.20.1 In-Reply-To: <20190208100554.32196-1-patrick.bellasi@arm.com> References: <20190208100554.32196-1-patrick.bellasi@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org When a task specific clamp value is configured via sched_setattr(2), this value is accounted in the corresponding clamp bucket every time the task is {en,de}qeued. However, when cgroups are also in use, the task specific clamp values could be restricted by the task_group (TG) clamp values. Update uclamp_cpu_inc() to aggregate task and TG clamp values. Every time a task is enqueued, it's accounted in the clamp_bucket defining the smaller clamp between the task specific value and its TG effective value. This allows to: 1. ensure cgroup clamps are always used to restrict task specific requests, i.e. boosted only up to the effective granted value or clamped at least to a certain value 2. implement a "nice-like" policy, where tasks are still allowed to request less then what enforced by their current TG This mimics what already happens for a task's CPU affinity mask when the task is also in a cpuset, i.e. cgroup attributes are always used to restrict per-task attributes. Do this by exploiting the concept of "effective" clamp, which is already used by a TG to track parent enforced restrictions. Apply task group clamp restrictions only to tasks belonging to a child group. While, for tasks in the root group or in an autogroup, only system defaults are enforced. Signed-off-by: Patrick Bellasi Cc: Ingo Molnar Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Tejun Heo --- kernel/sched/core.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c index 35e9f06af08d..6f8f68d18d0f 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/core.c +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c @@ -823,10 +823,44 @@ static inline void uclamp_rq_update(struct rq *rq, unsigned int clamp_id, WRITE_ONCE(rq->uclamp[clamp_id].value, max_value); } +static inline bool +uclamp_tg_restricted(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int clamp_id, + unsigned int *clamp_value, unsigned int *bucket_id) +{ +#ifdef CONFIG_UCLAMP_TASK_GROUP + unsigned int clamp_max, bucket_max; + struct uclamp_se *tg_clamp; + + /* + * Tasks in an autogroup or the root task group are restricted by + * system defaults. + */ + if (task_group_is_autogroup(task_group(p))) + return false; + if (task_group(p) == &root_task_group) + return false; + + tg_clamp = &task_group(p)->uclamp[clamp_id]; + bucket_max = tg_clamp->effective.bucket_id; + clamp_max = tg_clamp->effective.value; + + if (!p->uclamp[clamp_id].user_defined || *clamp_value > clamp_max) { + *clamp_value = clamp_max; + *bucket_id = bucket_max; + } + + return true; +#else + return false; +#endif +} + /* * The effective clamp bucket index of a task depends on, by increasing * priority: * - the task specific clamp value, when explicitly requested from userspace + * - the task group effective clamp value, for tasks not either in the root + * group or in an autogroup * - the system default clamp value, defined by the sysadmin * * As a side effect, update the task's effective value: @@ -841,7 +875,13 @@ uclamp_effective_get(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int clamp_id, *bucket_id = p->uclamp[clamp_id].bucket_id; *clamp_value = p->uclamp[clamp_id].value; - /* Always apply system default restrictions */ + /* + * If we have task groups and we are running in a child group, system + * default are already affecting the group's clamp values. + */ + if (uclamp_tg_restricted(p, clamp_id, clamp_value, bucket_id)) + return; + if (unlikely(*clamp_value > uclamp_default[clamp_id].value)) { *clamp_value = uclamp_default[clamp_id].value; *bucket_id = uclamp_default[clamp_id].bucket_id; -- 2.20.1