Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/35] ARM: davinci: modernize the irq support
To:     Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>,
        David Lechner <david@lechnology.com>
CC:     Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>,
        Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
References: <20190131133928.17985-1-brgl@bgdev.pl>
 <edfcdc52-3ff0-ec58-94f7-4816d2b2b3f4@lechnology.com>
 <CAMRc=MfPAg_j-DfaQCaTd2GmBDctv7L0eSzTET+fcj+WArejdg@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>
Message-ID: <b70bbda8-b448-d9d1-e3fa-57dbfa6c2fbb@ti.com>
Date:   Fri, 8 Feb 2019 17:13:48 +0530
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/60.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAMRc=MfPAg_j-DfaQCaTd2GmBDctv7L0eSzTET+fcj+WArejdg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 05/02/19 9:41 PM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> pon., 4 lut 2019 o 22:49 David Lechner <david@lechnology.com> napisał(a):
>>
>> On 1/31/19 7:38 AM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
>>> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
>>>
>>> This series ports the davinci platform to using SPARSE_IRQ, cleans up
>>> the irqchip drivers and moves them over to drivers/irqchip.
>>>
>>
>> This has been on my todo list for years, but I've never had enough
>> time to figure it out. Nice to see it finally getting done!
>>
>> Series tested on LEGO MINDSTORMS EV3 (da850-like). I can now use
>> IIO triggers without having to patch the kernel to add extra
>> interrupts.
>>
>> Tested-by: David Lechner <david@lechnology.com>
>>
>>
> 
> Wow thanks for taking the time to review it!
> 
> I'll address certain remarks - for those unaddressed - I'll fix them in v2.
> 
> Sekhar: are you fine with sending both the clocksource and interrupt
> series together next time with additional patches on top making
> davinci part of multi_v5_defconfig?

I think its better to keep them separate. You can base both on latest
mainline.

Thanks,
Sekhar