Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20190131133928.17985-1-brgl@bgdev.pl> <edfcdc52-3ff0-ec58-94f7-4816d2b2b3f4@lechnology.com>
 <CAMRc=MfPAg_j-DfaQCaTd2GmBDctv7L0eSzTET+fcj+WArejdg@mail.gmail.com> <b70bbda8-b448-d9d1-e3fa-57dbfa6c2fbb@ti.com>
In-Reply-To: <b70bbda8-b448-d9d1-e3fa-57dbfa6c2fbb@ti.com>
From:   Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
Date:   Fri, 8 Feb 2019 13:27:26 +0100
Message-ID: <CAMRc=McNvvowdQG3zNhLpAuOL-Q_U1184mTwcJWJMRxto1LYbg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/35] ARM: davinci: modernize the irq support
To:     Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>
Cc:     David Lechner <david@lechnology.com>,
        Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>,
        Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

pt., 8 lut 2019 o 12:43 Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> napisa=C5=82(a):
>
> On 05/02/19 9:41 PM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > pon., 4 lut 2019 o 22:49 David Lechner <david@lechnology.com> napisa=C5=
=82(a):
> >>
> >> On 1/31/19 7:38 AM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> >>> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
> >>>
> >>> This series ports the davinci platform to using SPARSE_IRQ, cleans up
> >>> the irqchip drivers and moves them over to drivers/irqchip.
> >>>
> >>
> >> This has been on my todo list for years, but I've never had enough
> >> time to figure it out. Nice to see it finally getting done!
> >>
> >> Series tested on LEGO MINDSTORMS EV3 (da850-like). I can now use
> >> IIO triggers without having to patch the kernel to add extra
> >> interrupts.
> >>
> >> Tested-by: David Lechner <david@lechnology.com>
> >>
> >>
> >
> > Wow thanks for taking the time to review it!
> >
> > I'll address certain remarks - for those unaddressed - I'll fix them in=
 v2.
> >
> > Sekhar: are you fine with sending both the clocksource and interrupt
> > series together next time with additional patches on top making
> > davinci part of multi_v5_defconfig?
>
> I think its better to keep them separate. You can base both on latest
> mainline.
>
> Thanks,
> Sekhar

If you prefer I can keep them separate, although there were a couple
conflicts when I merged them in my tree, which are now resolved.

Let's maybe start with the interrupts (I'll send a v2 tonight if you
don't have any more comments), and once you have that in your tree, I
will rebase the timer code and then the multi_v5 series.

Bart