Received: by 2002:ac0:946b:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j40csp1629394imj; Fri, 8 Feb 2019 04:52:18 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AHgI3IZP8SmTD/5rcWOxlthVw+vqoWicZ4+5rxiCzzMdX2/If8v3PYkCeJYJo7d2nU/kJSUG0h5o X-Received: by 2002:a63:65c7:: with SMTP id z190mr15585400pgb.249.1549630338385; Fri, 08 Feb 2019 04:52:18 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1549630338; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=WsUQ4LqLtna/LrVBsXm5jILI684Zz6HfFulyh9XJAikqNlzdkA/BcBdZJfr3iLMvRN oF1a7Zmmt5Y3mOsDZWI/yXJ9M63Wky31bJ1gQPUkfO3xOqaaE+oRjYsSyAnboeSmotRF 1csDefPR74zsq/jhnifYJNvoUyT7mKtUEwEXrNKwjHid58B7AxenG33T5X5d9QOQ7bAX fP9yPrY6C9yBEYKiyTJtozxUfBFYKhRJwjoIrRXOxf072o+4VHb85UMj4ofz7AdQOfZn 9UuCR01OXRATWOYFtRicCY5ihR133jGiH+GCmroyyITks2k8Nv7R+0avT6EHiwA66tem 3z0A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=qnHdX7TnXOEiHXHYVasMmzva4CaTpXguv8jLldqZ/zM=; b=NAAKKVjr8TZwG+NhFq74ZTBsweuOhysTioLKxxT2iJNhqw+FmSqY/lo5st7Ur73w9Z 5Hg85cEvjgD158hOKicfAiUsXtRAOTQiZRP3Vfu5k035WzDw8qhOzh9eoGu3jup927fI mPTJViKdltLxyRTWE5nCeDKoKGJ4GHGzUMG+SarjNGeYT78PADVmCx56J8Ih4dfw8URY QewS1yQzo53JuNOWEH+E0ikE8CmwIws97rMOOcU0GAw36OARcYjH1vfitqvGIpbFQ8uP KzHfp5mMCeDzovQsF5UuCmwkka7EckCsESeKbrci3DCSa9woFj0KIekLszuCD4y+TaWK As0g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@mobiveil.co.in header.s=google header.b=0k9WPPCK; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id gn11si1840181plb.94.2019.02.08.04.52.02; Fri, 08 Feb 2019 04:52:18 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@mobiveil.co.in header.s=google header.b=0k9WPPCK; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727309AbfBHMul (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 8 Feb 2019 07:50:41 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-f67.google.com ([209.85.221.67]:36479 "EHLO mail-wr1-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726624AbfBHMul (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Feb 2019 07:50:41 -0500 Received: by mail-wr1-f67.google.com with SMTP id z3so3473811wrv.3 for ; Fri, 08 Feb 2019 04:50:40 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mobiveil.co.in; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=qnHdX7TnXOEiHXHYVasMmzva4CaTpXguv8jLldqZ/zM=; b=0k9WPPCKKItYXzndcogdzxnVoO9cQlpjEn2qq4gxRc/FV272WdMDa/HugcL9upD7P6 t8xXnl6q1RTUo5498d+qetP/xj0gz+rlcUWUhDBPM2JNl47QC+KxFSUeH4b9wHJX+A4E dK7tUg9ny3O1jwPkgEAHETOzII/BJLVdDNXV4= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=qnHdX7TnXOEiHXHYVasMmzva4CaTpXguv8jLldqZ/zM=; b=W/LYGNV9tJSr8Js62OSq7486SQ9JAClfgr/qUKbs5rl6BBNwWbLmdxmDK1ePI2TOut ceAasUWHLaWG6tpMi5IFQdYLWMq0V/N91O1dFPapZtzaeTLEOGyZ25Pj8a68pnIDnfYs 0+cABb7E5XWocY8ad0NobwgO2ZDdfKWHwifbY6+SixWup3JkxKm/V2m5OZqqdHi8yA9M 1JMFD2Ze3VgSLqWv3tThRbsc3Aj0gjJ1SqorACdAg5fvvxOOET7WZEm1RDnevj9WVQw0 LjOA73zv6c2MAgrgeZudTntemQWwTmMxgpe7LU2SSf0bWy8gvtevz5fSNUxByB6kuJxI ib+g== X-Gm-Message-State: AHQUAubaSEJpEPEWCO4q4ll0lGslK94GajvOtMCd9sG/nfwUsgqW/rOy 3DllsNL5ft4/nRguTWfvSyrHU1oOJpOV4A3DOTec+A== X-Received: by 2002:adf:fd81:: with SMTP id d1mr16559738wrr.105.1549630239150; Fri, 08 Feb 2019 04:50:39 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190129080926.36773-1-Zhiqiang.Hou@nxp.com> <20190129080926.36773-26-Zhiqiang.Hou@nxp.com> In-Reply-To: <20190129080926.36773-26-Zhiqiang.Hou@nxp.com> From: Subrahmanya Lingappa Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2019 18:23:18 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 25/27] PCI: mobiveil: ls_pcie_g4: add Workaround for A-011451 To: "Z.q. Hou" Cc: "linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "bhelgaas@google.com" , "robh+dt@kernel.org" , "mark.rutland@arm.com" , "shawnguo@kernel.org" , Leo Li , "lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com" , "catalin.marinas@arm.com" , "will.deacon@arm.com" , Mingkai Hu , "M.h. Lian" , Xiaowei Bao Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org ZQ, On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 1:41 PM Z.q. Hou wrote: > > From: Hou Zhiqiang > > When LX2 PCIe controller is sending multiple split completions and > ACK latency expires indicating that ACK should be send at priority. > But because of large number of split completions and FC update DLLP, > the controller does not give priority to ACK transmission. This > results into ACK latency timer timeout error at the link partner and > the pending TLPs are replayed by the link partner again. > > Workaround: > 1. Reduce the ACK latency timeout value to a very small value. > 2. Restrict the number of completions from the LX2 PCIe controller > to 1, by changing the Max Read Request Size (MRRS) of link partner > to the same value as Max Packet size (MPS). > > This patch implemented part 1, the part 2 can be set by kernel parameter > 'pci=pcie_bus_perf' > > This ERRATA is only for LX2160A Rev1.0, and it will be fixed > in Rev2.0. > > Signed-off-by: Hou Zhiqiang > --- > V3: > - Integrated without change from http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1006796/ > > .../pci/controller/mobiveil/pci-layerscape-gen4.c | 15 +++++++++++++++ > drivers/pci/controller/mobiveil/pcie-mobiveil.h | 4 ++++ > 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/mobiveil/pci-layerscape-gen4.c b/drivers/pci/controller/mobiveil/pci-layerscape-gen4.c > index d2c5dbbd5e3c..20ce146788ca 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/mobiveil/pci-layerscape-gen4.c > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/mobiveil/pci-layerscape-gen4.c > @@ -82,12 +82,27 @@ static bool ls_pcie_g4_is_bridge(struct ls_pcie_g4 *pcie) > return header_type == PCI_HEADER_TYPE_BRIDGE; > } > > +static void workaround_A011451(struct ls_pcie_g4 *pcie) > +{ > + struct mobiveil_pcie *mv_pci = pcie->pci; > + u32 val; > + > + /* Set ACK latency timeout */ > + val = csr_readl(mv_pci, GPEX_ACK_REPLAY_TO); > + val &= ~(ACK_LAT_TO_VAL_MASK << ACK_LAT_TO_VAL_SHIFT); > + val |= (4 << ACK_LAT_TO_VAL_SHIFT); > + csr_writel(mv_pci, val, GPEX_ACK_REPLAY_TO); > +} > + > static int ls_pcie_g4_host_init(struct mobiveil_pcie *pci) > { > struct ls_pcie_g4 *pcie = to_ls_pcie_g4(pci); > > pcie->rev = csr_readb(pci, PCI_REVISION_ID); > > + if (pcie->rev == REV_1_0) > + workaround_A011451(pcie); > + > return 0; > } > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/mobiveil/pcie-mobiveil.h b/drivers/pci/controller/mobiveil/pcie-mobiveil.h > index ab43de5e4b2b..f0e2e4ae09b5 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/mobiveil/pcie-mobiveil.h > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/mobiveil/pcie-mobiveil.h > @@ -85,6 +85,10 @@ > #define PAB_AXI_AMAP_PEX_WIN_H(win) PAB_REG_ADDR(0x0bac, win) > #define PAB_INTP_AXI_PIO_CLASS 0x474 > > +#define GPEX_ACK_REPLAY_TO 0x438 > +#define ACK_LAT_TO_VAL_MASK 0x1fff > +#define ACK_LAT_TO_VAL_SHIFT 0 > + > #define PAB_PEX_AMAP_CTRL(win) PAB_REG_ADDR(0x4ba0, win) > #define AMAP_CTRL_EN_SHIFT 0 > #define AMAP_CTRL_TYPE_SHIFT 1 > -- > 2.17.1 > again, can we avoid errata number on patch title and have a brief title instead?