Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Message-Id: <49a0635b91577b6bc160a5ddcf980a81c64823bd.1549630193.git.christophe.leroy@c-s.fr>
In-Reply-To: <cover.1549630193.git.christophe.leroy@c-s.fr>
References: <cover.1549630193.git.christophe.leroy@c-s.fr>
From:   Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr>
Subject: [PATCH v1 05/16] powerpc/40x: Don't use SPRN_SPRG_SCRATCH2 in
 EXCEPTION_PROLOG
To:     Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
        Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Date:   Fri,  8 Feb 2019 12:52:27 +0000 (UTC)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Unlike said in the comment, r1 is not reused by the critical
exception handler, as it uses a dedicated critirq_ctx stack.
Decrementing r1 early is then unneeded.

Should the above be valid, the code is crap buggy anyway as
r1 gets some intermediate values that would jeopardise the
whole process (for instance after mfspr   r1,SPRN_SPRG_THREAD)

Using SPRN_SPRG_SCRATCH2 to save r1 is then not needed, r11 can be
used instead. This avoids one mtspr and one mfspr and makes the
prolog closer to what's done on 6xx and 8xx.

Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr>
---
 arch/powerpc/kernel/head_40x.S | 21 +++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/head_40x.S b/arch/powerpc/kernel/head_40x.S
index 3088c9f29f5e..59f6f53f1ac2 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/head_40x.S
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/head_40x.S
@@ -102,23 +102,20 @@ _ENTRY(saved_ksp_limit)
  * Exception vector entry code. This code runs with address translation
  * turned off (i.e. using physical addresses). We assume SPRG_THREAD has
  * the physical address of the current task thread_struct.
- * Note that we have to have decremented r1 before we write to any fields
- * of the exception frame, since a critical interrupt could occur at any
- * time, and it will write to the area immediately below the current r1.
  */
 #define NORMAL_EXCEPTION_PROLOG						     \
 	mtspr	SPRN_SPRG_SCRATCH0,r10;	/* save two registers to work with */\
 	mtspr	SPRN_SPRG_SCRATCH1,r11;					     \
-	mtspr	SPRN_SPRG_SCRATCH2,r1;					     \
 	mfcr	r10;			/* save CR in r10 for now	   */\
 	mfspr	r11,SPRN_SRR1;		/* check whether user or kernel    */\
 	andi.	r11,r11,MSR_PR;						     \
-	beq	1f;							     \
-	mfspr	r1,SPRN_SPRG_THREAD;	/* if from user, start at top of   */\
-	lwz	r1,TASK_STACK-THREAD(r1); /* this thread's kernel stack   */\
-	addi	r1,r1,THREAD_SIZE;					     \
-1:	subi	r1,r1,INT_FRAME_SIZE;	/* Allocate an exception frame     */\
 	tophys(r11,r1);							     \
+	beq	1f;							     \
+	mfspr	r11,SPRN_SPRG_THREAD;	/* if from user, start at top of   */\
+	lwz	r11,TASK_STACK-THREAD(r11); /* this thread's kernel stack */\
+	addi	r11,r11,THREAD_SIZE;					     \
+	tophys(r11,r11);						     \
+1:	subi	r11,r11,INT_FRAME_SIZE;	/* Allocate an exception frame     */\
 	stw	r10,_CCR(r11);          /* save various registers	   */\
 	stw	r12,GPR12(r11);						     \
 	stw	r9,GPR9(r11);						     \
@@ -128,11 +125,11 @@ _ENTRY(saved_ksp_limit)
 	stw	r12,GPR11(r11);						     \
 	mflr	r10;							     \
 	stw	r10,_LINK(r11);						     \
-	mfspr	r10,SPRN_SPRG_SCRATCH2;					     \
 	mfspr	r12,SPRN_SRR0;						     \
-	stw	r10,GPR1(r11);						     \
+	stw	r1,GPR1(r11);						     \
 	mfspr	r9,SPRN_SRR1;						     \
-	stw	r10,0(r11);						     \
+	stw	r1,0(r11);						     \
+	tovirt(r1,r11);			/* set new kernel sp */	\
 	rlwinm	r9,r9,0,14,12;		/* clear MSR_WE (necessary?)	   */\
 	stw	r0,GPR0(r11);						     \
 	SAVE_4GPRS(3, r11);						     \
-- 
2.13.3