Received: by 2002:ac0:946b:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j40csp1639599imj; Fri, 8 Feb 2019 05:03:07 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AHgI3IZvG9/UitfXrygXrPx2XfHn/GdwCsyJZgHLIu+7ckdLwoipjXvojM5Mh8yTieAeZkEsx9xb X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:9a07:: with SMTP id v7mr22146184plp.247.1549630987922; Fri, 08 Feb 2019 05:03:07 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1549630987; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=KF5SithJYRj4lj+RBoN4TgcKERM7oCF+wqlkh05ROdkXjuXWMGxIqVv4tLoYlrb/eZ kDxazrHLvMynI2/nG7i+wnLxKPUIy+bSxRWTlZ8oKHtNcrJOHZzM3Hth41FCrKcTrvAG wMu31pArHbrgCfuXI1BmOXVL3a69EzuhK1x2okyA62/OAdYGnTzvcsGDqroAT2Im53Q9 1guzweSjBhegGknqaxmvQIgMRpNRTGTobSBCMwX5U5IYhcgHJWCDD3cCtaC/ec1Co3Jq m66+Dfktc025vUaS4MGc2jF4VMHJ2LQF6d85b1+J9I7tUCtMZfjwVoOyK1pcnzidlxU0 qCrg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:date:message-id:subject:cc:from:to :in-reply-to; bh=zIC1gDFj+sIVBD4LIn5k5iZQ2PZNGRkmPosyZyn8WVQ=; b=Y6kI1HLwnQalVDrCcwTPIGiuLtXR+PxvI8VG7YtZpgO3yMvwb+YsThuBojtys3gwXc NQ0QRaJzGnAl/G+Ix1270cf3gHHYnVTOUtKc3vBmbSwxDEOqNKSSFpow7DZfPyr5epYj qHFCYMlnFCwSi20XZdpz03h4mwcDXV+KyVELdOOBKdKA3PrdJGEjNl/zqNzmplnuyHC7 jAj9w+Xm2oSyEDbHqkpYCIx8GnjHoc+pP/XeDMcS3OX69T011o6PdX8tEWywJIhxEWoy ZA1Ic7urhEYjQFnEXElftZsj7+I3nbMc8dMw+3Kd0ZfzpwdAgcdVgxB1b9zfP2CrYFOA KAdg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id q16si2049381pgh.185.2019.02.08.05.02.50; Fri, 08 Feb 2019 05:03:07 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727580AbfBHNCj (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 8 Feb 2019 08:02:39 -0500 Received: from ozlabs.org ([203.11.71.1]:39993 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727489AbfBHNCg (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Feb 2019 08:02:36 -0500 Received: by ozlabs.org (Postfix, from userid 1034) id 43wwMG0vPgz9sNL; Sat, 9 Feb 2019 00:02:33 +1100 (AEDT) X-powerpc-patch-notification: thanks X-powerpc-patch-commit: eddd0b332304d554ad6243942f87c2fcea98c56b X-Patchwork-Hint: ignore In-Reply-To: <20190122155724.27557-2-joe.lawrence@redhat.com> To: Joe Lawrence , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, live-patching@vger.kernel.org From: Michael Ellerman Cc: Nicolai Stange , Jiri Kosina , Josh Poimboeuf , Torsten Duwe Subject: Re: [1/4] powerpc/64s: Clear on-stack exception marker upon exception return Message-Id: <43wwMG0vPgz9sNL@ozlabs.org> Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2019 00:02:33 +1100 (AEDT) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2019-01-22 at 15:57:21 UTC, Joe Lawrence wrote: > From: Nicolai Stange > > The ppc64 specific implementation of the reliable stacktracer, > save_stack_trace_tsk_reliable(), bails out and reports an "unreliable > trace" whenever it finds an exception frame on the stack. Stack frames > are classified as exception frames if the STACK_FRAME_REGS_MARKER magic, > as written by exception prologues, is found at a particular location. > > However, as observed by Joe Lawrence, it is possible in practice that > non-exception stack frames can alias with prior exception frames and thus, > that the reliable stacktracer can find a stale STACK_FRAME_REGS_MARKER on > the stack. It in turn falsely reports an unreliable stacktrace and blocks > any live patching transition to finish. Said condition lasts until the > stack frame is overwritten/initialized by function call or other means. > > In principle, we could mitigate this by making the exception frame > classification condition in save_stack_trace_tsk_reliable() stronger: > in addition to testing for STACK_FRAME_REGS_MARKER, we could also take into > account that for all exceptions executing on the kernel stack > - their stack frames's backlink pointers always match what is saved > in their pt_regs instance's ->gpr[1] slot and that > - their exception frame size equals STACK_INT_FRAME_SIZE, a value > uncommonly large for non-exception frames. > > However, while these are currently true, relying on them would make the > reliable stacktrace implementation more sensitive towards future changes in > the exception entry code. Note that false negatives, i.e. not detecting > exception frames, would silently break the live patching consistency model. > > Furthermore, certain other places (diagnostic stacktraces, perf, xmon) > rely on STACK_FRAME_REGS_MARKER as well. > > Make the exception exit code clear the on-stack STACK_FRAME_REGS_MARKER > for those exceptions running on the "normal" kernel stack and returning > to kernelspace: because the topmost frame is ignored by the reliable stack > tracer anyway, returns to userspace don't need to take care of clearing > the marker. > > Furthermore, as I don't have the ability to test this on Book 3E or > 32 bits, limit the change to Book 3S and 64 bits. > > Finally, make the HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE Kconfig option depend on > PPC_BOOK3S_64 for documentation purposes. Before this patch, it depended > on PPC64 && CPU_LITTLE_ENDIAN and because CPU_LITTLE_ENDIAN implies > PPC_BOOK3S_64, there's no functional change here. > > Fixes: df78d3f61480 ("powerpc/livepatch: Implement reliable stack tracing for the consistency model") > Reported-by: Joe Lawrence > Signed-off-by: Nicolai Stange > Signed-off-by: Joe Lawrence Series applied to powerpc next, thanks. https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/eddd0b332304d554ad6243942f87c2fc cheers