Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Fri, 8 Feb 2019 18:39:08 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To:     Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc:     William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@gmail.com>,
        linus.walleij@linaro.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/8] Introduce the for_each_set_clump8 macro
Message-ID: <20190208163908.GR9224@smile.fi.intel.com>
References: <cover.1547445576.git.vilhelm.gray@gmail.com>
 <20190129170734.688a6adf91267cc6f1b5fa08@linux-foundation.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20190129170734.688a6adf91267cc6f1b5fa08@linux-foundation.org>
Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 05:07:34PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Jan 2019 15:19:17 +0900 William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@gmail.com> wrote:

> It's a shame that it doesn't actually dercease the kernel line count,
> but there are other benefits.
> 
> The patches are missing the hoped-for acks, but I think you maintain
> most/all of those drivers.

I'm okay with the code as well, so,
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>

> Do we have any expectation that these facilities will be used by
> anything other than GPIO?  If not then perhaps they should be sited
> within drivers/gpio (presumably as a standalone module) until such a
> need is found?

I think I have an example out of GPIO realm. But I need time to prove that.
In any case I tend to bend to the generic exposure than to local one.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko