Received: by 2002:ac0:946b:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j40csp1947036imj; Fri, 8 Feb 2019 09:51:00 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AHgI3IZWpwswA4WR6vMM+T5Mpi7cYZ/A2d4HEOja2VvEzH80OKHno1Kbl8S+FYYFv/VL6pl0XzEg X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:bd0a:: with SMTP id p10mr23323783pls.322.1549648260365; Fri, 08 Feb 2019 09:51:00 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1549648260; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=l1s7gf/siHfwWbxbslG9VXpVqjUElhqnZdmvhrweUbKQQy7x/25B+Wa/U4GgI92d0J uikZZ9uFcrx9iRLVfiYFK0eTxmeYn0DDg8+WnM/HPtHzIKtGIq2flN+SQeh1gIBuCOc+ kfcACChBSU8b1l15b+HHcsN6UmWqsJbgtnrW0YuHEkpaMhcHN8VvwR//iktQP13gf1Hl qkecKOonqvD9m3VHFDzwPSleo+RSTNh4Yxu6Te76oF9JqBtX+hEVOjbCT4x0TCyy0IjK EsFJuVGJNRuibaqHs608g2GG4gwNPAH/l7ahBVGSbqZ/ThDD70/3L5rXoVIk3uArqBAs pM/g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-language:thread-index :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:subject :in-reply-to:references:cc:to:from; bh=xVPJzgo4H9J/yTn6aa3wRD4G8TLIVMZIsbJNDGHouHA=; b=eHl0WVRBL9qdY/sM/8nF1Pf8jOZ1rRcXFA8Sh/53k/4wZsWvtUNFgoma27ZXDHaX/H PpNjGbVPgk0gGQ1/SuDEH6F6UqZ88IkHNOHklJ8cSb74eX3RKIpmQssYzGZruQ09FEkb iav5WRqe42mkaXxLWxbT82rtDCTl+QcjZZuq9AlIfdr6+J/x8C4FhqcSikTzcyIAfTAS mYqI88UWqOdKv1xC61Og2odbP1p+SGmXyOGcFELTQPv7vlf9mrD5VqNyqmgyVOkOr+gA HgZVpUgHAUMeO9mlLsjDsj06/skKVZ+RL0mvtsSnDIq5HwlURsR1xz9ozFCXSRU1+g/R 1V9Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id e4si3318310plk.300.2019.02.08.09.50.44; Fri, 08 Feb 2019 09:51:00 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728086AbfBHRuW convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 8 Feb 2019 12:50:22 -0500 Received: from elephants.elehost.com ([216.66.27.132]:36302 "EHLO elephants.elehost.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727999AbfBHRuP (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Feb 2019 12:50:15 -0500 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at elehost.com Received: from gnash (CPE00fc8d49d843-CM00fc8d49d840.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [99.229.179.249]) (authenticated bits=0) by elephants.elehost.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id x18Ho6Qt080923 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 8 Feb 2019 12:50:06 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from rsbecker@nexbridge.com) From: "Randall S. Becker" To: "'Jeff King'" Cc: "'Junio C Hamano'" , , "'Linux Kernel'" , References: <000f01d4bf9e$a508eab0$ef1ac010$@nexbridge.com> <20190208165052.GC23461@sigill.intra.peff.net> In-Reply-To: <20190208165052.GC23461@sigill.intra.peff.net> Subject: RE: [Breakage] Git v2.21.0-rc0 - t5318 (NonStop) Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2019 12:49:59 -0500 Message-ID: <001101d4bfd6$b9430230$2bc90690$@nexbridge.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0 Thread-Index: AQE5rFddSF2c8coPnbFiKb9P+8bdAwH0igmPpvyuCaA= Content-Language: en-ca Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On February 8, 2019 11:51, Jeff King wrote: > On Fri, Feb 08, 2019 at 06:08:33AM -0500, Randall S. Becker wrote: > > > t5318 is rather problematic and I have no good way to fix this. There > > is no /dev/zero on the platform, and the corrupt_graph_and_verify > > hard-codes if=/dev/zero, which is a linux-specific pseudo device. > > Please provide a more platform independent way of testing this > > feature. Pretty much all subtests from 46 onward fail as a result. > > We did discuss this at the time of the patch, but it seems we already use > /dev/zero in a bunch of places: > > https://public-inbox.org/git/xmqqbm57rkg5.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com/ > > Were you just skipping the other tests before? I did not catch the implications of the review at the time - my bad. We were not intentionally skipping the tests. It looks like some are automatically skipped. t4153 automatically skips (missing TTY), and t5562 fails also but for a different reason (hang - we don't have apache2 to serve up http content). Would you object to something like this: if [ ! -e /dev/zero ]; then # use shred or some other mechanism (still trying to figure out a solution) else # existing dd fi