Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Extend TPM PPI interface to support revision 1.3
To:     Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc:     "Safford, David (GE Global Research)" <david.safford@ge.com>,
        Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        "linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org" <linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org" 
        <linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
References: <20190109221103.1897677-1-stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
 <BCA04D5D9A3B764C9B7405BBA4D4A3C0151A3125@ALPMBAPA12.e2k.ad.ge.com>
 <20190118150011.GF4080@linux.intel.com>
 <cb86f5b6-8084-1e12-ce60-19418539b581@linux.ibm.com>
 <20190208220025.GB13567@linux.intel.com>
From:   Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.ibm.com>
Date:   Fri, 8 Feb 2019 17:06:33 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/60.3.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20190208220025.GB13567@linux.intel.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-MW
Message-Id: <d34dd6ec-248e-b7f8-edb0-367f1f4f9356@linux.ibm.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 2/8/19 5:00 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 08, 2019 at 04:21:02PM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:
> I still think that in 5/5 branching could be better but is not a biggie
> for me (does not make the implementation as whole any kind of mess) and
> since it is now peer tested I rather would not modify it right now.
>
> Applied to master and next!


5/5 may cause a complaint about the scanf'ing of a single value in an 
existing line. Let's see...

    Thanks.

       Stefan