Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Sat, 9 Feb 2019 17:25:45 +0100
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
To:     Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
Cc:     Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>,
        davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
        Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@bootlin.com>,
        thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com, gregory.clement@bootlin.com,
        miquel.raynal@bootlin.com, nadavh@marvell.com, stefanc@marvell.com,
        mw@semihalf.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 00/10] net: phy: Add support for 2.5GBASET
 PHYs
Message-ID: <20190209162545.GA30856@lunn.ch>
References: <20190207094939.27369-1-maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>
 <81c340ea-54b0-1abf-94af-b8dc4ee83e3a@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <81c340ea-54b0-1abf-94af-b8dc4ee83e3a@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

> I'd propose that you extract generic patches being submission-ready
> and split the patch series into two. I think the following patches
> would be candidates for the first series: 2, 3, 5, 6
> (provided they have no dependency on the other patches)
> Based on that both of us can go on with our work.
> 
> Andrew, what do you think?

Yes, that would help.

Heiner, can you also submit the .get_features patches soon. That is
another important piece of the puzzle for both drivers.

	Thanks
		Andrew