Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: [PATCH] blk-sysfs: Rework documention of __blk_release_queue
To:     Marcos Souza <marcos.souza.org@gmail.com>
Cc:     open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "open list:BLOCK LAYER" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>
References: <20190131011139.2264742-1-marcos.souza.org@gmail.com>
 <02fcaaa4-3667-7144-5ca2-4e5346380439@gmail.com>
 <813bdf91-83de-332d-5d6b-2287039578b5@kernel.dk>
 <CAH0vN5JF6p0B+uO2CQ-+Bv_cEtBRtWdpLJHD9mYAf3Ht2GncdA@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Message-ID: <9d1b596a-e5c6-6ad4-0a03-789bddb3d090@kernel.dk>
Date:   Sun, 10 Feb 2019 08:50:53 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/60.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAH0vN5JF6p0B+uO2CQ-+Bv_cEtBRtWdpLJHD9mYAf3Ht2GncdA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 2/10/19 8:44 AM, Marcos Souza wrote:
> 
> 
> On Sun, Feb 10, 2019, 13:23 Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk <mailto:axboe@kernel.dk> wrote:
> 
>     On 2/9/19 11:34 AM, Marcos Paulo de Souza wrote:
>     > Ping :)
>     >
>     > On 1/30/19 11:11 PM, Marcos Paulo de Souza wrote:
>     >> The Notes section of the comment was removed, because now
>     >> blk_release_queue can only be executed from blk_cleanup_queue (being
>     >> called when the q->kobj reaches zero), and also blk_init_queue was removed
>     >> in a1ce35fa4985.
>     >>
>     >> Signed-off-by: Marcos Paulo de Souza <marcos.souza.org@gmail.com <mailto:marcos.souza.org@gmail.com>>
>     >> ---
>     >>  This is basically a v2 of https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/1/14/1098
>     >>
>     >>  But, I tried to describe when this function is called, removing redundancies.
>     >>  Maybe it would be better placed in blk-core.c, where the q->kobj is initialized
>     >>  with blk_queue_ktype (which .release pointer points to blk_release_queue)?
>     >>
>     >>  block/blk-sysfs.c | 19 +++++++------------
>     >>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>     >>
>     >> diff --git a/block/blk-sysfs.c b/block/blk-sysfs.c
>     >> index 590d1ef2f961..d4dea9179fa6 100644
>     >> --- a/block/blk-sysfs.c
>     >> +++ b/block/blk-sysfs.c
>     >> @@ -817,21 +817,16 @@ static void blk_free_queue_rcu(struct rcu_head *rcu_head)
>     >>  }
>     >> 
>     >>  /**
>     >> - * __blk_release_queue - release a request queue when it is no longer needed
>     >> + * __blk_release_queue - release a request queue
>     >>   * @work: pointer to the release_work member of the request queue to be released
>     >>   *
>     >>   * Description:
>     >> - *     blk_release_queue is the counterpart of blk_init_queue(). It should be
>     >> - *     called when a request queue is being released; typically when a block
>     >> - *     device is being de-registered. Its primary task it to free the queue
>     >> - *     itself.
>     >> - *
>     >> - * Notes:
>     >> - *     The low level driver must have finished any outstanding requests first
>     >> - *     via blk_cleanup_queue().
>     >> - *
>     >> - *     Although blk_release_queue() may be called with preemption disabled,
>     >> - *     __blk_release_queue() may sleep.
>     >> + *     This function is called when a block device is being de-registered. The
> 
>     unregistered
> 
>     >> + *     process of releasing a request queue starts with blk_cleanup_queue, which
>     >> + *     set the appropriate flags and the calls blk_put_queue, that decrements
> 
>     s/the/then
> 
> 
> Thanks foe the review. Do you want me to send a v2?

Yes please.

-- 
Jens Axboe