Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Sun, 10 Feb 2019 19:58:11 +0100 (CET)
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To:     Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@nexb.com>
cc:     Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, Jessica Yu <jeyu@kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
        Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
        Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] module: Cure the MODULE_LICENSE "GPL" vs. "GPL v2"
 bogosity
In-Reply-To: <CAOFm3uE9DakoBsPv6GrSfeHMQOoGsFBj61o-p0YfxmEvjYRsvg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1902101957040.8784@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
References: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1901282105450.1669@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> <20190129130658.GA19205@linux-8ccs> <alpine.DEB.2.21.1901291510060.1513@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> <20190206172151.56fcce6c@lwn.net> <alpine.DEB.2.21.1902081649290.2144@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
 <CAOFm3uE9DakoBsPv6GrSfeHMQOoGsFBj61o-p0YfxmEvjYRsvg@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (DEB 202 2017-01-01)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Sat, 9 Feb 2019, Philippe Ombredanne wrote:
> > + * Both "GPL v2" and "GPL" (the latter also in dual licensed strings) are
> > + * merily stating that the module is licensed under the GPL v2, but are not
> 
> Nit: did you mean merely (as mere/just) ? or merily/merrily (as in
> cheerfully/happily) ? :D

Bah. merely of course.

Jon, want me to resend?

Thanks,

	tglx