Received: by 2002:ac0:946b:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j40csp2295840imj; Sun, 10 Feb 2019 23:48:00 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AHgI3Iad2+YK3BKZaFa//BLCIARB20G225LTBvACTlUqo8jYD1e+9/BBmkfgyPbVol3sE23bgpdJ X-Received: by 2002:a63:2905:: with SMTP id p5mr32545830pgp.178.1549871280889; Sun, 10 Feb 2019 23:48:00 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1549871280; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=mh5abppO+bhUt4a44B8EC6uYXaodOeeDilavHab25X+5XkTM7b8Hq+CfVWwqyfyQmG C09eHFHrug3nQkXJfFU9IDLXAjIpzTitVEHEvH/7J3BTelTpu04a8bMx3K45jjGyfw2d eFpjQGAIC4HWgc/b9NyHj2E/AoNurKIXiXuibYJDohshxP6N/T4SYfWkBwDttb+KB15h /mjCDo0y8DDaos8QSpVpYz1hpL0pmg5e0wDNXQzpobnbiEVra83p6TFQkzYfB5M9q2gk JIp71JELZTHio3aJkEiRlh6suSBcHMzEbeywoSyarFZWbK+RFesTytmWwph3SGRZ/5Q6 K4yA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=vyotfl+UypKb6Ix40Lvtdnmc4KKwBoaVORNp/kK+cRw=; b=KCLPToywmNfpFdIFg7vxeTIaWEwjrLZgbXou9nPJq3O3fU4r+YITekJmm1ML3vTpyl suGZb0YacXrFaJ7ZeVrXu0JegOeiIHJO8sHzoHI27tPE5QtZ3YrAifMGK1CUBucUk9G4 edf6GRNbcP8Jjx22R8NQ3QFvTgWFUgzPAsdWqReC4HdfmGOeW8QyLqgwzU4T01nd872V ZUG2/VZCF27WmZcSVdzMbtWdAsQKZQe0/UvYi+QEwxw1kwrU4Qe0bocx2BCQnmzTPTWC Vz/ZLI9xt0t7sU3mk/9ovKI76CHLvVl/0BZ1iYhwI4h4wOkO9jvkvS6PGydIFslIkYCM dZmQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id j4si2769855pgc.186.2019.02.10.23.47.44; Sun, 10 Feb 2019 23:48:00 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726986AbfBKHqs (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 11 Feb 2019 02:46:48 -0500 Received: from relay7-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.200]:46395 "EHLO relay7-d.mail.gandi.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725931AbfBKHqs (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Feb 2019 02:46:48 -0500 X-Originating-IP: 90.88.22.177 Received: from bootlin.com (aaubervilliers-681-1-80-177.w90-88.abo.wanadoo.fr [90.88.22.177]) (Authenticated sender: maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com) by relay7-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D066620003; Mon, 11 Feb 2019 07:46:43 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 08:46:43 +0100 From: Maxime Chevallier To: Heiner Kallweit Cc: davem@davemloft.net, Andrew Lunn , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Florian Fainelli , Russell King , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Antoine Tenart , thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com, gregory.clement@bootlin.com, miquel.raynal@bootlin.com, nadavh@marvell.com, stefanc@marvell.com, mw@semihalf.com Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 00/10] net: phy: Add support for 2.5GBASET PHYs Message-ID: <20190211084643.0d4766d6@bootlin.com> In-Reply-To: <81c340ea-54b0-1abf-94af-b8dc4ee83e3a@gmail.com> References: <20190207094939.27369-1-maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com> <81c340ea-54b0-1abf-94af-b8dc4ee83e3a@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.1 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello Heiner, >Hi Maxime, > >Andrew and me are working on Aquantia PHY support and he handed over >to me a patch series which includes parts of the first version of your >series. Having said that I'm especially interested in your patches >5 and 6. Because your series is somewhat bigger and there are a few >review comments, preparing the next round may take time. > >I'd propose that you extract generic patches being submission-ready >and split the patch series into two. I think the following patches >would be candidates for the first series: 2, 3, 5, 6 >(provided they have no dependency on the other patches) >Based on that both of us can go on with our work. Sure, I'll sent that shortly. Thanks for the help, Maxime