Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] iio: counter: stm32-lptimer: Add power management
 support
To:     =?UTF-8?Q?Uwe_Kleine-K=c3=b6nig?= <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>,
        Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
CC:     <thierry.reding@gmail.com>, <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        <mark.rutland@arm.com>, <alexandre.torgue@st.com>,
        <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>, <linux-iio@vger.kernel.org>,
        <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org>,
        <vilhelm.gray@gmail.com>,
        <linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com>
References: <1549370429-19116-1-git-send-email-fabrice.gasnier@st.com>
 <1549370429-19116-5-git-send-email-fabrice.gasnier@st.com>
 <20190209162133.65e6fd93@archlinux>
 <20190210213320.fs5kzezyzwd6akpx@pengutronix.de>
From:   Fabrice Gasnier <fabrice.gasnier@st.com>
Message-ID: <7abbd3e2-4a33-975a-39ee-dcf608633b36@st.com>
Date:   Mon, 11 Feb 2019 14:21:25 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/60.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20190210213320.fs5kzezyzwd6akpx@pengutronix.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 2/10/19 10:33 PM, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 09, 2019 at 04:21:33PM +0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
>> On Tue, 5 Feb 2019 13:40:29 +0100
>> Fabrice Gasnier <fabrice.gasnier@st.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Add suspend/resume PM sleep ops. When going to low power, disable
>>> active counter. Only active counter should be resumed: don't touch
>>> disabled counter, as it may be used by other LPTimer MFD child driver.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Fabrice Gasnier <fabrice.gasnier@st.com>
>> I think this looks fine.  I'm not totally sure if patches 3,4 are
>> separable from 1,2 though so please let me know whether I should take
>> these now, or let all 4 go in together via some path?
> 
> I'd say these are orthogonal, so if you are happy with patches 3 and 4
> you can take them without bothering for patches 1 and 2.

Hi Uwe, Jonathan,

Thanks for reviewing. I confirm you can take patches 3 and 4. I'll send
a v2 for patches 1 and 2 separately.

Best regards,
Fabrice

> 
> Best regards
> Uwe
>