Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262699AbUCJVSQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Mar 2004 16:18:16 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262848AbUCJVR6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Mar 2004 16:17:58 -0500 Received: from 69-90-55-107.fastdsl.ca ([69.90.55.107]:50365 "EHLO TMA-1.brad-x.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262699AbUCJVQH (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Mar 2004 16:16:07 -0500 Message-ID: <404F85A6.6070505@brad-x.com> Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 16:16:22 -0500 From: Brad Laue User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040307 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: ksoftirqd using mysteriously high amounts of CPU time Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2034 Lines: 53 Greetings, all I'm running into an issue where ksoftirqd/0 consumes a considerably larger amount of CPU time than it should, and begins to actively consume 99% CPU time during network operations. I've done my best to diagnose this, but it has followed me from kernel 2.4.20 to 2.6.3 and all versions in between, on three different server systems with distinct hardware configurations. The latest system to be affected by this takes considerably longer to have trouble, but this is only due to its sheer muscle to begin with (2x MP 2800+), but does indeed appear. After 55 days of uptime: 5 root 34 19 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:21.40 ksoftirqd_CPU0 6 root 34 19 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:36.31 ksoftirqd_CPU1 Compare this to another machine which I don't run myself: 3 root 19 19 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:09.86 ksoftirqd_CPU0 There are peculiarities to my configuration which are shared on all the affected machines - the use of PPPoE to connect is one example. However on one of the affected systems a second network interface was subjected to heavy NFS traffic over simple ethernet and exhibited the same behavior. Another shared trait is a firewall ruleset I've written for the machines, which I can attach if someone would like to see them. The three configurations include: K6-2 500MHz Ne2K, RealTek 8139 Duron 900MHz SiS 900, RealTek 8139 2x Athlon MP 2800+ 3com 3c905b 10/100+ The issue begins with ksoftirqd consuming more time than usual, and ends after four to twelve weeks depending on how powerful the machine, with the machine crippled and unable to sustain network traffic of any kind. Any assistance on where to look for solutions to this kind of problem would be GREATLY appreciated. Thanks in advance! Brad - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/