Received: by 2002:ac0:946b:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j40csp2744605imj; Mon, 11 Feb 2019 07:51:45 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AHgI3IbM/UJ9zgef8f4OMhx9jQL0K/ZWhx59wtMyU5gqJAxDoTYFlUAX7kLVsu9DyxNIXgYrNZro X-Received: by 2002:a63:d005:: with SMTP id z5mr33872699pgf.64.1549900305862; Mon, 11 Feb 2019 07:51:45 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1549900305; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=EunimY4b32ws9BKBGnQUTIc27nAUffAezfw9eqyBCOJMORk9wqdvtf4xkka3/2jZ9W bGCHtyz/YL0jmhkt8Tm36InVfm53f6hJmhO99MECiJIrYnybYufLL7KOIcYJPmvR3tSK W2eJAFzVEwMFpZt3uItwxuncDux0BrJac4ahg+wPXhGQhtsv2IifFvCb3zIqMOi8xRCy XudlWbaznAPZxbvGsBpbVO6Fi2s/9celrT1MWNXCSRABXoYtEGf3IT9/SUluIpZL2jx7 mv+TmCPiKbf5CWWT/2vHvuoeoU1CUqYHovtHYeTWOxVzsgoikHO7neqpfQYcLzkItrSD hrZw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to :from:dkim-signature; bh=H7esYWTu5jIFklMA3fvXXG4nOdqzvIeLYAk3rfQ4ULc=; b=wCizuKm2PME942/meXHuqJlqTZDa6mVZE6cOoZIQNFYyLCOFcjNBv8X1O5cMe7nrle 8sG4Gbnw9KPEs8s4XokWKH+aUcPDL5SQwL0M27g/5RhJq13WLXH6mNwpDyan8ugaakLU DzNyDKgme/l/UAIuuQjMfEkfoAlNHn+MJgY8g/c4ZJshuXSLJhwckQdkE/5PL0X6KHkg oaagxipPHUnpl4F2CE0nnPZoT2GnDSRjaU1Q5i1nI5ta9vTaH/N4bOjDHMMXmn6MlQxV 63WL0U0a2RBgL/csK6Oy8paMhfO+06HoSu4fKlxYXpfLo+KrP2pxxssb9a9VnZpEi+/3 k/vw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=CmDCRC1b; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id s5si10279507plr.211.2019.02.11.07.51.29; Mon, 11 Feb 2019 07:51:45 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=CmDCRC1b; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731412AbfBKOjR (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 11 Feb 2019 09:39:17 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:49410 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1731348AbfBKOjP (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Feb 2019 09:39:15 -0500 Received: from localhost (5356596B.cm-6-7b.dynamic.ziggo.nl [83.86.89.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 82236204FD; Mon, 11 Feb 2019 14:39:13 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1549895954; bh=VyoDQac3EzEIRzDuYJrE080cOn0aMaQB7t3onXdTEUk=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=CmDCRC1blt3ouVTkO9p5ohB9k3PJGmAE0KcSKDA8P/T02pi3QDR9yhVJANv22ilpW D4tAEPGawtUzkO05unGCxl7FngjFW2HLNWM3td8EQ5Q427InM5NT0n0foODSsqEzeE MsEEamRv4X2I2i+yi+cZeXHcAHCvNaZTHC5kWt8c= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Mathias Duckeck , Lukas Wunner , Julia Cartwright , Linus Walleij , Sasha Levin Subject: [PATCH 4.19 005/313] pinctrl: bcm2835: Use raw spinlock for RT compatibility Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 15:14:45 +0100 Message-Id: <20190211141853.152404879@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.20.1 In-Reply-To: <20190211141852.749630980@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20190211141852.749630980@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.65 X-stable: review X-Patchwork-Hint: ignore MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 4.19-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ [ Upstream commit 3c7b30f704b6f5e53eed6bf89cf2c8d1b38b02c0 ] The BCM2835 pinctrl driver acquires a spinlock in its ->irq_enable, ->irq_disable and ->irq_set_type callbacks. Spinlocks become sleeping locks with CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL=y, therefore invocation of one of the callbacks in atomic context may cause a hard lockup if at least two GPIO pins in the same bank are used as interrupts. The issue doesn't occur with just a single interrupt pin per bank because the lock is never contended. I'm experiencing such lockups with GPIO 8 and 28 used as level-triggered interrupts, i.e. with ->irq_disable being invoked on reception of every IRQ. The critical section protected by the spinlock is very small (one bitop and one RMW of an MMIO register), hence converting to a raw spinlock seems a better trade-off than converting the driver to threaded IRQ handling (which would increase latency to handle an interrupt). Cc: Mathias Duckeck Signed-off-by: Lukas Wunner Acked-by: Julia Cartwright Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-bcm2835.c | 16 ++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-bcm2835.c b/drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-bcm2835.c index fa530913a2c8..08925d24180b 100644 --- a/drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-bcm2835.c +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-bcm2835.c @@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ struct bcm2835_pinctrl { struct gpio_chip gpio_chip; struct pinctrl_gpio_range gpio_range; - spinlock_t irq_lock[BCM2835_NUM_BANKS]; + raw_spinlock_t irq_lock[BCM2835_NUM_BANKS]; }; /* pins are just named GPIO0..GPIO53 */ @@ -461,10 +461,10 @@ static void bcm2835_gpio_irq_enable(struct irq_data *data) unsigned bank = GPIO_REG_OFFSET(gpio); unsigned long flags; - spin_lock_irqsave(&pc->irq_lock[bank], flags); + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&pc->irq_lock[bank], flags); set_bit(offset, &pc->enabled_irq_map[bank]); bcm2835_gpio_irq_config(pc, gpio, true); - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pc->irq_lock[bank], flags); + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pc->irq_lock[bank], flags); } static void bcm2835_gpio_irq_disable(struct irq_data *data) @@ -476,12 +476,12 @@ static void bcm2835_gpio_irq_disable(struct irq_data *data) unsigned bank = GPIO_REG_OFFSET(gpio); unsigned long flags; - spin_lock_irqsave(&pc->irq_lock[bank], flags); + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&pc->irq_lock[bank], flags); bcm2835_gpio_irq_config(pc, gpio, false); /* Clear events that were latched prior to clearing event sources */ bcm2835_gpio_set_bit(pc, GPEDS0, gpio); clear_bit(offset, &pc->enabled_irq_map[bank]); - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pc->irq_lock[bank], flags); + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pc->irq_lock[bank], flags); } static int __bcm2835_gpio_irq_set_type_disabled(struct bcm2835_pinctrl *pc, @@ -584,7 +584,7 @@ static int bcm2835_gpio_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *data, unsigned int type) unsigned long flags; int ret; - spin_lock_irqsave(&pc->irq_lock[bank], flags); + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&pc->irq_lock[bank], flags); if (test_bit(offset, &pc->enabled_irq_map[bank])) ret = __bcm2835_gpio_irq_set_type_enabled(pc, gpio, type); @@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ static int bcm2835_gpio_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *data, unsigned int type) else irq_set_handler_locked(data, handle_level_irq); - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pc->irq_lock[bank], flags); + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pc->irq_lock[bank], flags); return ret; } @@ -1047,7 +1047,7 @@ static int bcm2835_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) for_each_set_bit(offset, &events, 32) bcm2835_gpio_wr(pc, GPEDS0 + i * 4, BIT(offset)); - spin_lock_init(&pc->irq_lock[i]); + raw_spin_lock_init(&pc->irq_lock[i]); } err = gpiochip_add_data(&pc->gpio_chip, pc); -- 2.19.1